PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXLLX vs. MXMDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXLLX vs. MXMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West Lifetime 2035 Fund (MXLLX) and Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund (MXMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXLLX achieves a 7.66% return, which is significantly lower than MXMDX's 14.38% return. Over the past 10 years, MXLLX has underperformed MXMDX with an annualized return of 7.82%, while MXMDX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.78% annualized return.


MXLLX

1D
1.14%
1M
-0.19%
6M
5.26%
YTD
7.66%
1Y
15.39%
3Y*
11.33%
5Y*
5.75%
10Y*
7.82%
ALL TIME*
6.16%

MXMDX

1D
0.79%
1M
-1.03%
6M
9.95%
YTD
14.38%
1Y
20.44%
3Y*
12.37%
5Y*
7.87%
10Y*
9.78%
ALL TIME*
8.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MXLLX vs. MXMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXLLX
Great-West Lifetime 2035 Fund
7.66%14.21%8.80%14.60%-15.77%13.55%13.01%23.02%-8.76%14.93%
MXMDX
Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund
14.38%6.90%13.23%15.75%-13.60%24.25%12.84%25.48%-12.02%15.01%

Correlation

The correlation between MXLLX and MXMDX is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2011

0.81

The correlation between MXLLX and MXMDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXLLX vs. MXMDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MXLLX
MXLLX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
MXLLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXLLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXLLX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
MXLLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXLLX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

MXMDX
MXMDX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
MXMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
MXMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MXLLX vs. MXMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Lifetime 2035 Fund (MXLLX) and Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund (MXMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MXLLXMXMDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.23

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

2.19

-0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.02

7.93

+0.08

MXLLX vs. MXMDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXLLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the MXMDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXLLX and MXMDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MXLLX vs. MXMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXLLX drawdown since its inception was -37.21%, smaller than the maximum MXMDX drawdown of -41.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXLLX and MXMDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXLLXMXMDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.21%

-41.80%

+4.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.22%

-8.87%

+1.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.43%

-24.15%

+12.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.28%

-24.15%

-2.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.09%

-41.80%

+12.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-2.23%

+1.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.46%

-5.90%

-3.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.76%

2.47%

-0.71%

Volatility

MXLLX vs. MXMDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Great-West Lifetime 2035 Fund (MXLLX) is 2.39%, while Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund (MXMDX) has a volatility of 3.47%. This indicates that MXLLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MXMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXLLXMXMDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.39%

3.47%

-1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.78%

11.55%

-3.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.21%

15.41%

-5.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.74%

19.92%

-7.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.54%

21.17%

-7.63%

MXLLX vs. MXMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXLLX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than MXMDX's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXLLX vs. MXMDX - Dividend Comparison

MXLLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%, less than MXMDX's 5.82% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXLLX
Great-West Lifetime 2035 Fund
3.80%4.09%5.91%4.17%8.24%9.48%5.18%9.14%11.17%3.48%
MXMDX
Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund
5.82%6.66%3.04%4.76%4.35%5.24%5.74%3.74%8.13%4.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXLLX and MXMDX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MXMDX has higher volatility (3.47%) compared to MXLLX (2.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXLLX dropped -37.21% vs MXMDX's -41.80%.

MXLLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXLLX and MXMDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer