PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
MXJP.L vs. CSJP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

MXJP.L vs. CSJP.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

MXJP.L (Invesco MSCI Japan UCITS ETF) and CSJP.L (iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Japan Equities funds tracking the TOPIX TR JPY, from Invesco and iShares respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MXJP.L returned 9.38%/yr vs 9.29%/yr for CSJP.L. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MXJP.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for CSJP.L.

Performance

MXJP.L vs. CSJP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (MXJP.L) and iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSJP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MXJP.L is traded in USD, while CSJP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CSJP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MXJP.L having a 16.21% return and CSJP.L slightly lower at 16.13%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MXJP.L having a 9.38% annualized return and CSJP.L not far behind at 9.29%.

MXJP.L

1D
-0.49%
1M
5.18%
YTD
16.21%
6M
16.14%
1Y
32.62%
3Y*
18.54%
5Y*
8.94%
10Y*
9.38%

CSJP.L

1D
-0.19%
1M
5.36%
YTD
16.13%
6M
16.45%
1Y
32.89%
3Y*
18.55%
5Y*
8.90%
10Y*
9.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXJP.L vs. CSJP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXJP.L
Invesco MSCI Japan UCITS ETF		16.21%25.85%7.21%20.47%-17.12%0.75%16.23%18.11%-13.56%24.18%
CSJP.L
iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		16.13%26.34%7.19%19.68%-17.24%0.84%15.60%18.51%-13.69%23.76%

Correlation

The correlation between MXJP.L and CSJP.L is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2012

0.91

The correlation between MXJP.L and CSJP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

MXJP.L vs. CSJP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
MXJP.L
CSJP.L

Industrials

26.0%
24.5%

Technology

19.1%
20.8%

Financial Services

17.5%
17.8%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
11.9%

Communication Services

7.9%
8.8%

Healthcare

6.3%
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
3.5%

Basic Materials

3.0%
3.0%

Real Estate

2.3%
1.9%

Utilities

1.1%
1.0%

Energy

1.1%
1.0%

Industrials

MXJP.L
26.0%
CSJP.L
24.5%

Technology

MXJP.L
19.1%
CSJP.L
20.8%

Financial Services

MXJP.L
17.5%
CSJP.L
17.8%

Consumer Cyclical

MXJP.L
12.2%
CSJP.L
11.9%

Communication Services

MXJP.L
7.9%
CSJP.L
8.8%

Healthcare

MXJP.L
6.3%
CSJP.L
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

MXJP.L
3.6%
CSJP.L
3.5%

Basic Materials

MXJP.L
3.0%
CSJP.L
3.0%

Real Estate

MXJP.L
2.3%
CSJP.L
1.9%

Utilities

MXJP.L
1.1%
CSJP.L
1.0%

Energy

MXJP.L
1.1%
CSJP.L
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Invesco MSCI Japan UCITS ETF

iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

Often compared with MXJP.L:
MXJP.L vs. LGJG.LMXJP.L vs. VJPA.LMXJP.L vs. IJPN.LMXJP.L vs. SJPA.LMXJP.L vs. LCJP.LMXJP.L vs. DXJP.LMXJP.L vs. DXJA.L
Often compared with CSJP.L:
CSJP.L vs. SJPA.LCSJP.L vs. LCJP.LCSJP.L vs. IJPN.LCSJP.L vs. PRIJ.LCSJP.L vs. XDJP.LCSJP.L vs. SUJA.LCSJP.L vs. PAXG.L

Return for Risk

MXJP.L vs. CSJP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
MXJP.L
MXJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
MXJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
MXJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
CSJP.L
CSJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
CSJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
CSJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXJP.L vs. CSJP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (MXJP.L) and iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSJP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

MXJP.LCSJP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.57
1.63

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.37
2.41

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.31

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

2.55

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.34

8.39

-0.05

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MXJP.L vs. CSJP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXJP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the CSJP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXJP.L and CSJP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

MXJP.LCSJP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

1.63

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.49

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.55

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.54

-0.04

Drawdowns

MXJP.L vs. CSJP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXJP.L drawdown since its inception was -32.48%, roughly equal to the maximum CSJP.L drawdown of -32.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXJP.L and CSJP.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

MXJP.LCSJP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.48%

-32.83%

+0.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.69%

-12.86%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.80%

-14.87%

+1.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.48%

-32.83%

+0.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.48%

-32.83%

+0.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

-0.19%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.80%

-7.93%

+0.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.90%

3.91%

-0.01%

Volatility

MXJP.L vs. CSJP.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (MXJP.L) and iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSJP.L) have volatilities of 4.61% and 4.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

MXJP.LCSJP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.61%

4.43%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.69%

16.22%

+0.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.68%

20.15%

+0.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.18%

18.06%

+0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.26%

17.07%

+0.19%

MXJP.L vs. CSJP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXJP.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than CSJP.L's 0.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

MXJP.L vs. CSJP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MXJP.L nor CSJP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 0.96, MXJP.L and CSJP.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, MXJP.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MXJP.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for CSJP.L.

Both ETFs track TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for MXJP.L and 0.48% for CSJP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXJP.L and CSJP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer