PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXIVX vs. RWIIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXIVX vs. RWIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West International Value Fund (MXIVX) and Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund (RWIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXIVX achieves a 8.70% return, which is significantly higher than RWIIX's 7.48% return.


MXIVX

1D
0.35%
1M
1.05%
YTD
8.70%
6M
8.16%
1Y
26.22%
3Y*
19.96%
5Y*
10.18%
10Y*
9.68%

RWIIX

1D
-0.14%
1M
-0.50%
YTD
7.48%
6M
7.64%
1Y
20.25%
3Y*
4.78%
5Y*
1.58%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXIVX vs. RWIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXIVX
Great-West International Value Fund
8.70%39.08%5.46%18.05%-15.20%10.38%10.20%22.07%-15.68%0.63%
RWIIX
Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund
7.48%7.87%-6.03%9.07%-11.57%10.68%14.57%4.58%-2.46%0.62%

Correlation

The correlation between MXIVX and RWIIX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 26, 2017

0.58

The correlation between MXIVX and RWIIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (all time) to 0.74 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXIVX vs. RWIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXIVX
MXIVX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
MXIVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXIVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXIVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
MXIVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXIVX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

RWIIX
RWIIX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
RWIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
RWIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXIVX vs. RWIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West International Value Fund (MXIVX) and Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund (RWIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MXIVXRWIIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.34

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

2.93

-0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.54

7.65

+0.89

MXIVX vs. RWIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXIVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the RWIIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXIVX and RWIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MXIVX vs. RWIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXIVX drawdown since its inception was -76.77%, which is greater than RWIIX's maximum drawdown of -20.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXIVX and RWIIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXIVXRWIIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.77%

-20.34%

-56.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.65%

-6.94%

-4.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.63%

-20.34%

+6.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.13%

-20.34%

-8.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.48%

-2.38%

+0.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.16%

-7.78%

-14.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

2.65%

+0.46%

Volatility

MXIVX vs. RWIIX - Volatility Comparison

Great-West International Value Fund (MXIVX) and Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund (RWIIX) have volatilities of 4.12% and 4.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXIVXRWIIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.12%

4.12%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.38%

9.08%

+2.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.22%

11.52%

+2.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.07%

11.63%

+4.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.40%

10.95%

+8.45%

MXIVX vs. RWIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXIVX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than RWIIX's 1.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXIVX vs. RWIIX - Dividend Comparison

MXIVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.48%, less than RWIIX's 8.13% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXIVX
Great-West International Value Fund
5.48%5.96%4.97%3.27%2.99%4.27%1.99%2.42%27.79%2.85%
RWIIX
Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund
8.13%8.74%0.00%6.82%1.72%14.15%6.51%1.84%0.86%0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXIVX and RWIIX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RWIIX has higher volatility (4.12%) compared to MXIVX (4.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXIVX dropped -76.77% vs RWIIX's -20.34%.

MXIVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXIVX and RWIIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer