MXIVX vs. IVFIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Great-West International Value Fund (MXIVX) and Federated Hermes International Strategic Value Dividend Fund (IVFIX).
MXIVX is managed by Great-West. It was launched on Dec 1, 1993. IVFIX is managed by Federated. It was launched on Jun 3, 2008.
Performance
MXIVX vs. IVFIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MXIVX vs. IVFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXIVX Great-West International Value Fund | -1.26% | 39.08% | 5.46% | 18.05% | -15.20% | 10.38% | 10.20% | 22.07% | -15.68% | 25.12% |
IVFIX Federated Hermes International Strategic Value Dividend Fund | 5.22% | 31.79% | 1.91% | 11.05% | -2.54% | 11.58% | -1.74% | 20.15% | -11.96% | 14.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXIVX achieves a -1.26% return, which is significantly lower than IVFIX's 5.22% return. Over the past 10 years, MXIVX has outperformed IVFIX with an annualized return of 8.52%, while IVFIX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.06% annualized return.
MXIVX
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- -10.51%
- YTD
- -1.26%
- 6M
- 4.58%
- 1Y
- 24.18%
- 3Y*
- 16.45%
- 5Y*
- 9.22%
- 10Y*
- 8.52%
IVFIX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -6.40%
- YTD
- 5.22%
- 6M
- 10.50%
- 1Y
- 23.17%
- 3Y*
- 13.89%
- 5Y*
- 10.28%
- 10Y*
- 7.06%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MXIVX vs. IVFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXIVX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than IVFIX's 0.86% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MXIVX vs. IVFIX — Risk / Return Rank
MXIVX
IVFIX
MXIVX vs. IVFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West International Value Fund (MXIVX) and Federated Hermes International Strategic Value Dividend Fund (IVFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MXIVX | IVFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.37 | 1.98 | -0.61 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.86 | 2.58 | -0.72 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.41 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | 4.08 | -2.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.32 | 17.43 | -10.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MXIVX | IVFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37 | 1.98 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.83 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.49 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.21 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between MXIVX and IVFIX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MXIVX vs. IVFIX - Dividend Comparison
MXIVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.04%, more than IVFIX's 3.14% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXIVX Great-West International Value Fund | 6.04% | 5.96% | 4.97% | 3.27% | 2.99% | 4.27% | 1.99% | 2.42% | 27.79% | 2.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IVFIX Federated Hermes International Strategic Value Dividend Fund | 3.14% | 3.37% | 4.44% | 4.01% | 3.99% | 3.67% | 3.62% | 3.98% | 4.97% | 4.17% | 3.38% | 3.95% |
Drawdowns
MXIVX vs. IVFIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXIVX drawdown since its inception was -76.77%, which is greater than IVFIX's maximum drawdown of -51.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXIVX and IVFIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXIVX | IVFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.77% | -51.49% | -25.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.65% | -8.47% | -3.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.13% | -21.29% | -7.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.18% | -33.46% | +0.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.51% | -6.58% | -3.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.30% | -11.69% | -10.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.22% | 1.98% | +1.24% |
Volatility
MXIVX vs. IVFIX - Volatility Comparison
Great-West International Value Fund (MXIVX) has a higher volatility of 6.34% compared to Federated Hermes International Strategic Value Dividend Fund (IVFIX) at 4.54%. This indicates that MXIVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MXIVX | IVFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.34% | 4.54% | +1.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.99% | 8.10% | +1.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.88% | 14.63% | +2.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.88% | 12.96% | +2.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.34% | 14.74% | +4.60% |