PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXIIX vs. LCRDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXIIX vs. LCRDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Touchstone Flexible Income Fund (MXIIX) and Lord Abbett Credit Opportunities Fund (LCRDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXIIX achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly lower than LCRDX's 2.26% return.


MXIIX

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.27%
YTD
0.99%
6M
1.11%
1Y
5.43%
3Y*
5.84%
5Y*
2.44%
10Y*
3.61%

LCRDX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.89%
YTD
2.26%
6M
1.57%
1Y
7.65%
3Y*
8.23%
5Y*
3.36%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXIIX vs. LCRDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MXIIX
Touchstone Flexible Income Fund
0.99%6.11%4.82%7.96%-8.14%3.17%8.05%
LCRDX
Lord Abbett Credit Opportunities Fund
2.26%5.03%10.16%11.25%-13.00%12.19%8.53%

Correlation

The correlation between MXIIX and LCRDX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2020

0.38

The correlation between MXIIX and LCRDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXIIX vs. LCRDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXIIX
MXIIX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
MXIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
MXIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

LCRDX
LCRDX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
LCRDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCRDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCRDX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
LCRDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCRDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXIIX vs. LCRDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone Flexible Income Fund (MXIIX) and Lord Abbett Credit Opportunities Fund (LCRDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MXIIXLCRDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.40

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.24

2.18

+0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.63

4.94

+2.69

MXIIX vs. LCRDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXIIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the LCRDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXIIX and LCRDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MXIIXLCRDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

1.84

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.72

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.92

-0.22

Drawdowns

MXIIX vs. LCRDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXIIX drawdown since its inception was -37.45%, which is greater than LCRDX's maximum drawdown of -22.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXIIX and LCRDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXIIXLCRDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.45%

-22.75%

-14.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.66%

-3.64%

+0.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.66%

-6.95%

+4.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.59%

-13.62%

+2.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.84%

-0.06%

-0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.44%

-4.28%

+0.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

1.60%

-0.82%

Volatility

MXIIX vs. LCRDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Touchstone Flexible Income Fund (MXIIX) is 1.21%, while Lord Abbett Credit Opportunities Fund (LCRDX) has a volatility of 1.32%. This indicates that MXIIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LCRDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXIIXLCRDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.21%

1.32%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.45%

3.17%

-0.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.34%

4.30%

-0.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.43%

4.68%

-1.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.41%

5.82%

-1.41%

MXIIX vs. LCRDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXIIX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than LCRDX's 1.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXIIX vs. LCRDX - Dividend Comparison

MXIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.25%, less than LCRDX's 10.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LCRDX
Lord Abbett Credit Opportunities Fund
10.35%9.81%9.09%9.54%5.10%9.71%4.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MXIIX
Touchstone Flexible Income Fund
5.25%4.66%4.03%3.77%4.70%3.49%4.66%3.84%4.04%2.72%2.91%3.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXIIX and LCRDX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LCRDX has higher volatility (1.32%) compared to MXIIX (1.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXIIX dropped -37.45% vs LCRDX's -22.75%.

LCRDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXIIX and LCRDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer