PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXIGX vs. MXMDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXIGX vs. MXMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West International Growth Fund (MXIGX) and Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund (MXMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXIGX achieves a 3.50% return, which is significantly lower than MXMDX's 13.95% return. Over the past 10 years, MXIGX has underperformed MXMDX with an annualized return of 6.52%, while MXMDX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.11% annualized return.


MXIGX

1D
0.21%
1M
4.50%
YTD
3.50%
6M
3.29%
1Y
5.77%
3Y*
6.91%
5Y*
-0.04%
10Y*
6.52%

MXMDX

1D
0.88%
1M
3.94%
YTD
13.95%
6M
14.10%
1Y
24.91%
3Y*
15.50%
5Y*
7.72%
10Y*
10.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXIGX vs. MXMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXIGX
Great-West International Growth Fund
3.50%11.53%4.04%16.54%-30.35%5.59%28.93%34.07%-16.91%26.64%
MXMDX
Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund
13.95%6.90%13.23%15.75%-13.60%24.25%12.84%25.48%-12.02%15.01%

Correlation

The correlation between MXIGX and MXMDX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2011

0.73

The correlation between MXIGX and MXMDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXIGX vs. MXMDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXIGX
MXIGX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
MXIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
MXIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

MXMDX
MXMDX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
MXMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
MXMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXIGX vs. MXMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West International Growth Fund (MXIGX) and Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund (MXMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MXIGXMXMDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.32

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.39

3.14

-2.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.31

11.25

-9.93

MXIGX vs. MXMDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXIGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the MXMDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXIGX and MXMDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MXIGXMXMDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

1.82

-1.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

0.39

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

0.48

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.45

-0.31

Drawdowns

MXIGX vs. MXMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXIGX drawdown since its inception was -66.36%, which is greater than MXMDX's maximum drawdown of -41.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXIGX and MXMDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXIGXMXMDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.36%

-41.80%

-24.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.47%

-8.87%

-4.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.25%

-24.15%

+6.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.70%

-24.15%

-19.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.70%

-41.80%

-1.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.88%

0.00%

-8.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.35%

-5.95%

-18.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.92%

2.47%

+1.45%

Volatility

MXIGX vs. MXMDX - Volatility Comparison

Great-West International Growth Fund (MXIGX) and Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund (MXMDX) have volatilities of 4.52% and 4.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXIGXMXMDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.52%

4.44%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.82%

11.29%

+1.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.68%

15.30%

+0.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.66%

19.99%

-0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.55%

21.23%

-1.68%

MXIGX vs. MXMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXIGX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than MXMDX's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXIGX vs. MXMDX - Dividend Comparison

MXIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.95%, less than MXMDX's 5.84% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXIGX
Great-West International Growth Fund
4.95%5.13%2.80%0.00%1.29%7.13%0.88%0.20%13.16%3.77%
MXMDX
Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund
5.84%6.66%3.04%4.76%4.35%5.24%5.74%3.74%8.13%4.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXIGX and MXMDX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MXIGX has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to MXMDX (4.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXIGX dropped -66.36% vs MXMDX's -41.80%.

MXMDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXIGX and MXMDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer