PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXIGX vs. MXBPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXIGX vs. MXBPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West International Growth Fund (MXIGX) and Great-West Moderately Aggressive Profile Fund (MXBPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXIGX achieves a 4.53% return, which is significantly lower than MXBPX's 9.38% return. Over the past 10 years, MXIGX has underperformed MXBPX with an annualized return of 6.53%, while MXBPX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.48% annualized return.


MXIGX

1D
2.14%
1M
0.21%
6M
1.92%
YTD
4.53%
1Y
8.35%
3Y*
6.92%
5Y*
-0.59%
10Y*
6.53%
ALL TIME*
2.97%

MXBPX

1D
0.99%
1M
0.25%
6M
6.39%
YTD
9.38%
1Y
17.21%
3Y*
11.82%
5Y*
6.62%
10Y*
7.48%
ALL TIME*
1.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MXIGX vs. MXBPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXIGX
Great-West International Growth Fund
4.53%11.53%4.04%16.54%-30.35%5.59%28.93%34.07%-16.91%26.64%
MXBPX
Great-West Moderately Aggressive Profile Fund
9.38%13.78%9.00%13.96%-13.04%14.39%11.44%20.91%-8.67%13.52%

Correlation

The correlation between MXIGX and MXBPX is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2003

0.78

The correlation between MXIGX and MXBPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (10 years) to 0.83 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXIGX vs. MXBPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MXIGX
MXIGX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
MXIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
MXIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

MXBPX
MXBPX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
MXBPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXBPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXBPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
MXBPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXBPX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MXIGX vs. MXBPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West International Growth Fund (MXIGX) and Great-West Moderately Aggressive Profile Fund (MXBPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MXIGXMXBPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.28

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.54

2.20

-1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.84

7.66

-5.82

MXIGX vs. MXBPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXIGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is lower than the MXBPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXIGX and MXBPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MXIGX vs. MXBPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXIGX drawdown since its inception was -66.36%, which is greater than MXBPX's maximum drawdown of -55.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXIGX and MXBPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXIGXMXBPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.36%

-55.80%

-10.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.47%

-7.12%

-6.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.25%

-11.46%

-5.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.70%

-25.51%

-18.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.70%

-28.63%

-15.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.98%

-0.24%

-7.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.24%

-20.86%

-3.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.98%

2.05%

+1.93%

Volatility

MXIGX vs. MXBPX - Volatility Comparison

Great-West International Growth Fund (MXIGX) has a higher volatility of 4.04% compared to Great-West Moderately Aggressive Profile Fund (MXBPX) at 2.28%. This indicates that MXIGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MXBPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXIGXMXBPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.04%

2.28%

+1.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.78%

7.76%

+6.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.40%

11.55%

+4.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.80%

13.49%

+6.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.35%

13.66%

+5.69%

MXIGX vs. MXBPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXIGX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than MXBPX's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXIGX vs. MXBPX - Dividend Comparison

MXIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.90%, less than MXBPX's 5.42% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXBPX
Great-West Moderately Aggressive Profile Fund
5.42%5.92%6.18%5.45%9.89%9.76%8.52%11.28%12.07%4.47%
MXIGX
Great-West International Growth Fund
4.90%5.13%2.80%0.00%1.29%7.13%0.88%0.20%13.16%3.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXIGX and MXBPX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MXIGX has higher volatility (4.04%) compared to MXBPX (2.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXIGX dropped -66.36% vs MXBPX's -55.80%.

MXBPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXIGX and MXBPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer