PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXIGX vs. MXBPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXIGX vs. MXBPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West International Growth Fund (MXIGX) and Great-West Moderately Aggressive Profile Fund (MXBPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXIGX achieves a 3.50% return, which is significantly lower than MXBPX's 8.18% return. Over the past 10 years, MXIGX has underperformed MXBPX with an annualized return of 6.52%, while MXBPX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.57% annualized return.


MXIGX

1D
0.21%
1M
4.50%
YTD
3.50%
6M
3.29%
1Y
5.77%
3Y*
6.91%
5Y*
-0.04%
10Y*
6.52%

MXBPX

1D
0.37%
1M
2.93%
YTD
8.18%
6M
8.85%
1Y
17.83%
3Y*
13.37%
5Y*
6.52%
10Y*
7.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXIGX vs. MXBPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXIGX
Great-West International Growth Fund
3.50%11.53%4.04%16.54%-30.35%5.59%28.93%34.07%-16.91%26.64%
MXBPX
Great-West Moderately Aggressive Profile Fund
8.18%13.78%9.00%13.96%-13.04%14.39%11.44%20.91%-8.67%13.52%

Correlation

The correlation between MXIGX and MXBPX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2003

0.78

The correlation between MXIGX and MXBPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXIGX vs. MXBPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXIGX
MXIGX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
MXIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
MXIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

MXBPX
MXBPX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
MXBPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXBPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXBPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
MXBPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXBPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXIGX vs. MXBPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West International Growth Fund (MXIGX) and Great-West Moderately Aggressive Profile Fund (MXBPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MXIGXMXBPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.34

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.39

2.56

-2.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.31

8.91

-7.60

MXIGX vs. MXBPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXIGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the MXBPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXIGX and MXBPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MXIGXMXBPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

1.64

-1.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

0.49

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

0.55

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.13

+0.01

Drawdowns

MXIGX vs. MXBPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXIGX drawdown since its inception was -66.36%, which is greater than MXBPX's maximum drawdown of -55.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXIGX and MXBPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXIGXMXBPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.36%

-55.80%

-10.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.47%

-7.12%

-6.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.25%

-11.46%

-5.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.70%

-25.51%

-18.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.70%

-28.63%

-15.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.88%

0.00%

-8.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.35%

-20.98%

-3.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.92%

2.04%

+1.88%

Volatility

MXIGX vs. MXBPX - Volatility Comparison

Great-West International Growth Fund (MXIGX) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to Great-West Moderately Aggressive Profile Fund (MXBPX) at 2.80%. This indicates that MXIGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MXBPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXIGXMXBPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.52%

2.80%

+1.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.82%

7.12%

+5.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.68%

11.10%

+4.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.66%

13.44%

+6.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.55%

13.69%

+5.86%

MXIGX vs. MXBPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXIGX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than MXBPX's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXIGX vs. MXBPX - Dividend Comparison

MXIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.95%, less than MXBPX's 5.48% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXBPX
Great-West Moderately Aggressive Profile Fund
5.48%5.92%6.18%5.45%9.89%9.76%8.52%11.28%12.07%4.47%
MXIGX
Great-West International Growth Fund
4.95%5.13%2.80%0.00%1.29%7.13%0.88%0.20%13.16%3.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXIGX and MXBPX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MXIGX has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to MXBPX (2.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXIGX dropped -66.36% vs MXBPX's -55.80%.

MXBPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXIGX and MXBPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer