PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXI vs. PYZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXI vs. PYZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Materials ETF (MXI) and Invesco DWA Basic Materials Momentum ETF (PYZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXI achieves a 11.62% return, which is significantly lower than PYZ's 14.78% return. Over the past 10 years, MXI has outperformed PYZ with an annualized return of 11.38%, while PYZ has yielded a comparatively lower 10.24% annualized return.


MXI

1D
-2.55%
1M
-2.16%
YTD
11.62%
6M
10.06%
1Y
29.81%
3Y*
13.19%
5Y*
6.60%
10Y*
11.38%

PYZ

1D
-2.80%
1M
-0.19%
YTD
14.78%
6M
11.00%
1Y
37.65%
3Y*
16.95%
5Y*
8.30%
10Y*
10.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXI vs. PYZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXI
iShares Global Materials ETF
11.62%27.43%-8.25%14.37%-9.09%15.06%22.31%22.19%-16.06%30.33%
PYZ
Invesco DWA Basic Materials Momentum ETF
14.78%28.01%2.54%9.56%-15.45%32.68%15.39%20.66%-24.33%20.01%

Correlation

The correlation between MXI and PYZ is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2006

0.83

The correlation between MXI and PYZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

MXI vs. PYZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MXI
PYZ

Basic Materials

95.2%
85.4%

Consumer Cyclical

4.4%
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

0.6%
0.6%

Industrials

0.5%
14.3%

Communication Services

-

-

Energy

-

3.8%

Financial Services

-

0.3%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

MXI
95.2%
PYZ
85.4%

Consumer Cyclical

MXI
4.4%
PYZ
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

MXI
0.6%
PYZ
0.6%

Industrials

MXI
0.5%
PYZ
14.3%

Communication Services

MXI

-

PYZ

-

Energy

MXI

-

PYZ
3.8%

Financial Services

MXI

-

PYZ
0.3%

Healthcare

MXI

-

PYZ

-

Real Estate

MXI

-

PYZ

-

Technology

MXI

-

PYZ

-

Utilities

MXI

-

PYZ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXI vs. PYZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXI
MXI Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
MXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXI Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
MXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXI Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

PYZ
PYZ Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
PYZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
PYZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXI vs. PYZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Materials ETF (MXI) and Invesco DWA Basic Materials Momentum ETF (PYZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MXIPYZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.25

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.85

2.13

-0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.13

6.94

+0.19

MXI vs. PYZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXI Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is comparable to the PYZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXI and PYZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MXI vs. PYZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXI drawdown since its inception was -68.44%, which is greater than PYZ's maximum drawdown of -65.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXI and PYZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXIPYZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.44%

-65.15%

-3.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.18%

-17.75%

+1.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.25%

-26.74%

+4.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.76%

-32.97%

+4.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.52%

-52.46%

+12.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.43%

-5.41%

-2.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.03%

-12.61%

-5.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.19%

5.44%

-1.25%

Volatility

MXI vs. PYZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Materials ETF (MXI) is 8.08%, while Invesco DWA Basic Materials Momentum ETF (PYZ) has a volatility of 8.54%. This indicates that MXI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PYZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXIPYZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.08%

8.54%

-0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.94%

20.88%

-2.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.66%

26.51%

-5.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.86%

25.76%

-5.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.42%

26.48%

-6.06%

MXI vs. PYZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXI has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than PYZ's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXI vs. PYZ - Dividend Comparison

MXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, more than PYZ's 0.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MXI
iShares Global Materials ETF
1.72%2.22%3.24%2.92%4.84%3.51%1.21%3.64%2.77%1.76%1.31%3.64%
PYZ
Invesco DWA Basic Materials Momentum ETF
0.47%0.72%1.13%1.19%1.18%0.33%1.04%1.38%1.20%0.53%1.07%1.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXI and PYZ have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PYZ has higher volatility (8.54%) compared to MXI (8.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXI dropped -68.44% vs PYZ's -65.15%.

On 10-year performance, MXI leads with 11.38% vs 10.24% for PYZ. On fees, MXI is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, MXI has been the lower-risk option at 8.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MXI has performed better with a 11.38% return vs 10.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MXI is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PYZ.

MXI has the higher dividend yield at 1.72%, compared with 0.47% for PYZ.

MXI is categorized as Materials, while PYZ is Momentum. MXI tracks S&P Global Materials Index, while PYZ tracks Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for MXI and 0.60% for PYZ.

MXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXI and PYZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer