MXI vs. PYZ
MXI (iShares Global Materials ETF) and PYZ (Invesco DWA Basic Materials Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MXI is a Materials fund tracking the S&P Global Materials Index, while PYZ is a Momentum fund tracking the Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Technical Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MXI returned 11.38%/yr vs 10.24%/yr for PYZ. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MXI charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PYZ.
Performance
MXI vs. PYZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXI achieves a 11.62% return, which is significantly lower than PYZ's 14.78% return. Over the past 10 years, MXI has outperformed PYZ with an annualized return of 11.38%, while PYZ has yielded a comparatively lower 10.24% annualized return.
MXI
- 1D
- -2.55%
- 1M
- -2.16%
- YTD
- 11.62%
- 6M
- 10.06%
- 1Y
- 29.81%
- 3Y*
- 13.19%
- 5Y*
- 6.60%
- 10Y*
- 11.38%
PYZ
- 1D
- -2.80%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- YTD
- 14.78%
- 6M
- 11.00%
- 1Y
- 37.65%
- 3Y*
- 16.95%
- 5Y*
- 8.30%
- 10Y*
- 10.24%
MXI vs. PYZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXI iShares Global Materials ETF | 11.62% | 27.43% | -8.25% | 14.37% | -9.09% | 15.06% | 22.31% | 22.19% | -16.06% | 30.33% |
PYZ Invesco DWA Basic Materials Momentum ETF | 14.78% | 28.01% | 2.54% | 9.56% | -15.45% | 32.68% | 15.39% | 20.66% | -24.33% | 20.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between MXI and PYZ is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2006 | 0.83 |
The correlation between MXI and PYZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
MXI vs. PYZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MXI
PYZ
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
MXI
PYZ
Consumer Cyclical
MXI
PYZ
Consumer Defensive
MXI
PYZ
Industrials
MXI
PYZ
Communication Services
MXI
-
PYZ
-
Energy
MXI
-
PYZ
Financial Services
MXI
-
PYZ
Healthcare
MXI
-
PYZ
-
Real Estate
MXI
-
PYZ
-
Technology
MXI
-
PYZ
-
Utilities
MXI
-
PYZ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MXI vs. PYZ — Risk / Return Rank
MXI
PYZ
MXI vs. PYZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Materials ETF (MXI) and Invesco DWA Basic Materials Momentum ETF (PYZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MXI | PYZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.25 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | 2.13 | -0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.13 | 6.94 | +0.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MXI vs. PYZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXI drawdown since its inception was -68.44%, which is greater than PYZ's maximum drawdown of -65.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXI and PYZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXI | PYZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.44% | -65.15% | -3.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.18% | -17.75% | +1.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.25% | -26.74% | +4.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.76% | -32.97% | +4.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.52% | -52.46% | +12.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.43% | -5.41% | -2.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.03% | -12.61% | -5.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.19% | 5.44% | -1.25% |
Volatility
MXI vs. PYZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Materials ETF (MXI) is 8.08%, while Invesco DWA Basic Materials Momentum ETF (PYZ) has a volatility of 8.54%. This indicates that MXI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PYZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MXI | PYZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.08% | 8.54% | -0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.94% | 20.88% | -2.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.66% | 26.51% | -5.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.86% | 25.76% | -5.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.42% | 26.48% | -6.06% |
MXI vs. PYZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXI has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than PYZ's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
MXI vs. PYZ - Dividend Comparison
MXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, more than PYZ's 0.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXI iShares Global Materials ETF | 1.72% | 2.22% | 3.24% | 2.92% | 4.84% | 3.51% | 1.21% | 3.64% | 2.77% | 1.76% | 1.31% | 3.64% |
PYZ Invesco DWA Basic Materials Momentum ETF | 0.47% | 0.72% | 1.13% | 1.19% | 1.18% | 0.33% | 1.04% | 1.38% | 1.20% | 0.53% | 1.07% | 1.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MXI and PYZ have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PYZ has higher volatility (8.54%) compared to MXI (8.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXI dropped -68.44% vs PYZ's -65.15%.
On 10-year performance, MXI leads with 11.38% vs 10.24% for PYZ. On fees, MXI is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, MXI has been the lower-risk option at 8.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MXI has performed better with a 11.38% return vs 10.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MXI is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PYZ.
MXI has the higher dividend yield at 1.72%, compared with 0.47% for PYZ.
MXI is categorized as Materials, while PYZ is Momentum. MXI tracks S&P Global Materials Index, while PYZ tracks Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for MXI and 0.60% for PYZ.
MXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MXI and PYZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer