MXGBX vs. DFGBX
MXGBX (Great-West Global Bond Fund) and DFGBX (DFA Five Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio) are both Global Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, MXGBX returned 0.22%/yr vs 1.26%/yr for DFGBX. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MXGBX charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for DFGBX.
Performance
MXGBX vs. DFGBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXGBX achieves a -2.01% return, which is significantly lower than DFGBX's 1.55% return. Over the past 10 years, MXGBX has underperformed DFGBX with an annualized return of 0.22%, while DFGBX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.26% annualized return.
MXGBX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.44%
- YTD
- -2.01%
- 6M
- -2.17%
- 1Y
- -0.71%
- 3Y*
- 2.92%
- 5Y*
- -1.71%
- 10Y*
- 0.22%
DFGBX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.65%
- 1Y
- 2.58%
- 3Y*
- 4.30%
- 5Y*
- 1.36%
- 10Y*
- 1.26%
MXGBX vs. DFGBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXGBX Great-West Global Bond Fund | -2.01% | 7.54% | -0.88% | 5.13% | -14.65% | -6.57% | 5.46% | 4.08% | -0.27% | 0.14% |
DFGBX DFA Five Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio | 1.55% | 3.13% | 5.37% | 5.00% | -6.63% | -1.03% | 1.52% | 4.04% | 1.68% | 0.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between MXGBX and DFGBX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 1999 | 0.12 |
Over the past year, MXGBX and DFGBX have become more correlated (0.53) than their long-term average of 0.12, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MXGBX vs. DFGBX — Risk / Return Rank
MXGBX
DFGBX
MXGBX vs. DFGBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Global Bond Fund (MXGBX) and DFA Five Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MXGBX | DFGBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.40 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.04 | 1.90 | -1.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.16 | 5.14 | -5.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MXGBX vs. DFGBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXGBX drawdown since its inception was -45.02%, which is greater than DFGBX's maximum drawdown of -9.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXGBX and DFGBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXGBX | DFGBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.02% | -9.63% | -35.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.80% | -1.38% | -5.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.25% | -1.67% | -5.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.16% | -9.63% | -14.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.80% | -9.63% | -17.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.38% | 0.00% | -34.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.62% | -0.93% | -19.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.88% | 0.50% | +1.38% |
Volatility
MXGBX vs. DFGBX - Volatility Comparison
Great-West Global Bond Fund (MXGBX) has a higher volatility of 1.40% compared to DFA Five Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGBX) at 0.44%. This indicates that MXGBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFGBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MXGBX | DFGBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.40% | 0.44% | +0.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.58% | 1.32% | +2.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.51% | 1.89% | +7.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.40% | 2.19% | +5.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.51% | 1.92% | +4.59% |
MXGBX vs. DFGBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXGBX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than DFGBX's 0.23% expense ratio.
Dividends
MXGBX vs. DFGBX - Dividend Comparison
MXGBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, less than DFGBX's 3.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFGBX DFA Five Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio | 3.42% | 2.91% | 4.69% | 3.61% | 1.63% | 0.73% | 0.03% | 2.30% | 4.74% | 0.89% | 1.16% | 1.72% |
MXGBX Great-West Global Bond Fund | 3.13% | 3.07% | 2.69% | 0.84% | 1.28% | 0.07% | 1.05% | 3.82% | 3.04% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MXGBX and DFGBX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MXGBX has higher volatility (1.40%) compared to DFGBX (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXGBX dropped -45.02% vs DFGBX's -9.63%.
DFGBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MXGBX and DFGBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer