PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
MXFS.L vs. ISDE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

MXFS.L vs. ISDE.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

MXFS.L (Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc) and ISDE.L (iShares MSCI EM Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - MXFS.L tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Total Return (Net) Index while ISDE.L tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Islamic Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MXFS.L returned 10.25%/yr vs 13.09%/yr for ISDE.L. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MXFS.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for ISDE.L.

Performance

MXFS.L vs. ISDE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc (MXFS.L) and iShares MSCI EM Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ISDE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXFS.L achieves a 25.90% return, which is significantly lower than ISDE.L's 60.11% return. Over the past 10 years, MXFS.L has underperformed ISDE.L with an annualized return of 10.25%, while ISDE.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.09% annualized return.

MXFS.L

1D
-1.64%
1M
5.43%
YTD
25.90%
6M
29.15%
1Y
52.52%
3Y*
23.85%
5Y*
7.19%
10Y*
10.25%

ISDE.L

1D
-2.79%
1M
13.41%
YTD
60.11%
6M
64.90%
1Y
107.18%
3Y*
32.29%
5Y*
12.82%
10Y*
13.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXFS.L vs. ISDE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXFS.L
Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc		25.90%33.98%7.21%7.99%-19.20%-3.47%18.07%19.21%-15.38%35.57%
ISDE.L
iShares MSCI EM Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist)		60.11%40.46%-3.55%13.97%-22.72%2.64%22.21%19.39%-17.27%41.72%

Correlation

The correlation between MXFS.L and ISDE.L is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2010

0.78

The correlation between MXFS.L and ISDE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

MXFS.L vs. ISDE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
MXFS.L
ISDE.L

Technology

35.4%
48.0%

Financial Services

20.3%
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
5.3%

Basic Materials

7.2%
12.2%

Communication Services

6.9%
0.9%

Industrials

6.8%
8.6%

Energy

3.8%
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.1%
3.3%

Healthcare

3.0%
4.8%

Utilities

2.3%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.1%
0.9%

Technology

MXFS.L
35.4%
ISDE.L
48.0%

Financial Services

MXFS.L
20.3%
ISDE.L
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

MXFS.L
9.3%
ISDE.L
5.3%

Basic Materials

MXFS.L
7.2%
ISDE.L
12.2%

Communication Services

MXFS.L
6.9%
ISDE.L
0.9%

Industrials

MXFS.L
6.8%
ISDE.L
8.6%

Energy

MXFS.L
3.8%
ISDE.L
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

MXFS.L
3.1%
ISDE.L
3.3%

Healthcare

MXFS.L
3.0%
ISDE.L
4.8%

Utilities

MXFS.L
2.3%
ISDE.L
2.3%

Real Estate

MXFS.L
1.1%
ISDE.L
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc

iShares MSCI EM Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist)

Often compared with MXFS.L:
MXFS.L vs. EIMI.LMXFS.L vs. GLDMXFS.L vs. DGSE.LMXFS.L vs. EMV.LMXFS.L vs. E127.LMXFS.L vs. EMDV.LMXFS.L vs. DEMS.L
Often compared with ISDE.L:
ISDE.L vs. JRDM.LISDE.L vs. VDEM.LISDE.L vs. VFEG.LISDE.L vs. LEML.LISDE.L vs. EDG2.LISDE.L vs. PRAM.LISDE.L vs. EMVL.L

Return for Risk

MXFS.L vs. ISDE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
MXFS.L
MXFS.L Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
MXFS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXFS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXFS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
MXFS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXFS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
ISDE.L
ISDE.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
ISDE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISDE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISDE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
ISDE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISDE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXFS.L vs. ISDE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc (MXFS.L) and iShares MSCI EM Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ISDE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

MXFS.LISDE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.65
4.28

-1.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.52
4.93

-1.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.73

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.10

7.48

-3.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.00

28.54

-13.54

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MXFS.L vs. ISDE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXFS.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is lower than the ISDE.L Sharpe Ratio of 4.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXFS.L and ISDE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

MXFS.LISDE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.65

4.28

-1.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.67

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.66

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.23

+0.08

Drawdowns

MXFS.L vs. ISDE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXFS.L drawdown since its inception was -39.81%, smaller than the maximum ISDE.L drawdown of -59.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXFS.L and ISDE.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

MXFS.LISDE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.81%

-59.96%

+20.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.76%

-14.25%

+1.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.92%

-21.81%

+4.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.18%

-32.28%

-4.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.78%

-36.67%

-3.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.80%

-3.68%

+0.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.32%

-21.89%

+6.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.49%

3.74%

-0.25%

Volatility

MXFS.L vs. ISDE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc (MXFS.L) is 8.67%, while iShares MSCI EM Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ISDE.L) has a volatility of 12.14%. This indicates that MXFS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISDE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

MXFS.LISDE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.67%

12.14%

-3.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.03%

22.26%

-5.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.77%

24.94%

-5.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.62%

19.26%

+0.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.62%

19.87%

+0.75%

MXFS.L vs. ISDE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXFS.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than ISDE.L's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

MXFS.L vs. ISDE.L - Dividend Comparison

MXFS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ISDE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISDE.L
iShares MSCI EM Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist)		1.08%1.86%2.51%2.77%2.10%1.79%0.98%1.55%1.64%1.02%1.07%2.32%
MXFS.L
Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

MXFS.L and ISDE.L have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MXFS.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MXFS.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for ISDE.L.

MXFS.L tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Total Return (Net) Index, while ISDE.L tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Islamic Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for MXFS.L and 0.85% for ISDE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXFS.L and ISDE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer