PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXFDX vs. MXMDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXFDX vs. MXMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West Core Bond Fund (MXFDX) and Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund (MXMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXFDX achieves a -0.20% return, which is significantly lower than MXMDX's 11.58% return. Over the past 10 years, MXFDX has underperformed MXMDX with an annualized return of 1.34%, while MXMDX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.89% annualized return.


MXFDX

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.00%
YTD
-0.20%
6M
-0.00%
1Y
4.14%
3Y*
3.78%
5Y*
-0.46%
10Y*
1.34%

MXMDX

1D
-1.51%
1M
0.43%
YTD
11.58%
6M
8.69%
1Y
21.48%
3Y*
13.91%
5Y*
7.13%
10Y*
9.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXFDX vs. MXMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXFDX
Great-West Core Bond Fund
-0.20%6.76%1.52%6.20%-14.70%-1.56%8.02%9.19%-1.12%3.27%
MXMDX
Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund
11.58%6.90%13.23%15.75%-13.60%24.25%12.84%25.48%-12.02%15.01%

Correlation

The correlation between MXFDX and MXMDX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2011

-0.04

The correlation between MXFDX and MXMDX shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXFDX vs. MXMDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXFDX
MXFDX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
MXFDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXFDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXFDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
MXFDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXFDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

MXMDX
MXMDX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
MXMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
MXMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXFDX vs. MXMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Core Bond Fund (MXFDX) and Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund (MXMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MXFDXMXMDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.25

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

2.46

-0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.42

8.82

-4.40

MXFDX vs. MXMDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXFDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is comparable to the MXMDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXFDX and MXMDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MXFDX vs. MXMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXFDX drawdown since its inception was -19.90%, smaller than the maximum MXMDX drawdown of -41.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXFDX and MXMDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXFDXMXMDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.90%

-41.80%

+21.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.98%

-8.87%

+5.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.63%

-24.15%

+17.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.88%

-24.15%

+4.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.90%

-41.80%

+21.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.55%

-2.37%

-1.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.24%

-5.94%

+1.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.03%

2.43%

-1.40%

Volatility

MXFDX vs. MXMDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Great-West Core Bond Fund (MXFDX) is 1.22%, while Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund (MXMDX) has a volatility of 4.46%. This indicates that MXFDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MXMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXFDXMXMDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.22%

4.46%

-3.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.68%

11.56%

-8.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.81%

15.40%

-11.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.35%

20.02%

-13.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.36%

21.23%

-15.87%

MXFDX vs. MXMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXFDX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than MXMDX's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXFDX vs. MXMDX - Dividend Comparison

MXFDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, less than MXMDX's 5.97% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXFDX
Great-West Core Bond Fund
2.88%2.87%3.23%2.18%1.21%2.62%3.08%2.41%2.40%1.42%
MXMDX
Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund
5.97%6.66%3.04%4.76%4.35%5.24%5.74%3.74%8.13%4.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXFDX and MXMDX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MXMDX has higher volatility (4.46%) compared to MXFDX (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXFDX dropped -19.90% vs MXMDX's -41.80%.

MXMDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXFDX and MXMDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer