PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXEQX vs. TMMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXEQX vs. TMMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West Large Cap Value Fund (MXEQX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund (TMMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXEQX achieves a 10.47% return, which is significantly higher than TMMAX's 4.41% return. Over the past 10 years, MXEQX has outperformed TMMAX with an annualized return of 19.55%, while TMMAX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.01% annualized return.


MXEQX

1D
-0.31%
1M
2.57%
YTD
10.47%
6M
12.50%
1Y
24.99%
3Y*
18.40%
5Y*
10.51%
10Y*
19.55%

TMMAX

1D
-0.57%
1M
0.84%
YTD
4.41%
6M
4.66%
1Y
10.15%
3Y*
12.67%
5Y*
9.47%
10Y*
10.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXEQX vs. TMMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXEQX
Great-West Large Cap Value Fund
10.47%16.92%15.35%12.28%-5.50%26.96%2.91%159.33%-9.91%15.41%
TMMAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund
4.41%11.03%17.07%7.32%-3.11%24.10%1.32%24.00%-2.84%15.19%

Correlation

The correlation between MXEQX and TMMAX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2007

0.84

The correlation between MXEQX and TMMAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXEQX vs. TMMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXEQX
MXEQX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
MXEQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXEQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXEQX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
MXEQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXEQX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

TMMAX
TMMAX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
TMMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
TMMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXEQX vs. TMMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Large Cap Value Fund (MXEQX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund (TMMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MXEQXTMMAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.20

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.66

1.67

+2.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.92

5.82

+8.10

MXEQX vs. TMMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXEQX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the TMMAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXEQX and TMMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MXEQXTMMAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

1.17

+1.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.50

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.56

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.54

-0.24

Drawdowns

MXEQX vs. TMMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXEQX drawdown since its inception was -66.85%, which is greater than TMMAX's maximum drawdown of -41.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXEQX and TMMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXEQXTMMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.85%

-41.50%

-25.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.03%

-5.78%

-1.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.90%

-23.00%

+8.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.81%

-23.00%

+6.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.73%

-33.41%

-4.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

-6.88%

+6.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.29%

-5.57%

-7.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

1.65%

+0.18%

Volatility

MXEQX vs. TMMAX - Volatility Comparison

Great-West Large Cap Value Fund (MXEQX) has a higher volatility of 2.47% compared to SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund (TMMAX) at 2.07%. This indicates that MXEQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXEQXTMMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.47%

2.07%

+0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.79%

5.83%

+1.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.43%

8.24%

+2.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.96%

19.07%

-4.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.72%

17.81%

+19.91%

MXEQX vs. TMMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXEQX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is lower than TMMAX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXEQX vs. TMMAX - Dividend Comparison

MXEQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than TMMAX's 24.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MXEQX
Great-West Large Cap Value Fund
1.63%1.80%3.99%2.17%0.93%2.87%1.72%2.89%6.51%4.13%0.00%0.00%
TMMAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund
24.23%25.19%23.39%15.23%6.54%4.73%2.15%3.67%4.91%4.10%4.17%5.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXEQX and TMMAX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MXEQX has higher volatility (2.47%) compared to TMMAX (2.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXEQX dropped -66.85% vs TMMAX's -41.50%.

MXEQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXEQX and TMMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer