MXEOX vs. FQEMX
MXEOX (Great-West Emerging Markets Equity Fund) and FQEMX (Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past 3 years, MXEOX returned 26.39%/yr vs 48.81%/yr for FQEMX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MXEOX charges 1.23%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FQEMX.
Performance
MXEOX vs. FQEMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXEOX achieves a 32.24% return, which is significantly lower than FQEMX's 90.46% return.
MXEOX
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 8.32%
- YTD
- 32.24%
- 6M
- 35.34%
- 1Y
- 59.40%
- 3Y*
- 26.39%
- 5Y*
- 7.85%
- 10Y*
- —
FQEMX
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 25.82%
- YTD
- 90.46%
- 6M
- 101.50%
- 1Y
- 166.09%
- 3Y*
- 48.81%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MXEOX vs. FQEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXEOX Great-West Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 32.24% | 32.78% | 9.84% | 9.67% | -22.34% | -4.97% |
FQEMX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM | 90.46% | 55.98% | 6.67% | 12.18% | -20.68% | 0.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between MXEOX and FQEMX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2021 | 0.83 |
The correlation between MXEOX and FQEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MXEOX vs. FQEMX — Risk / Return Rank
MXEOX
FQEMX
MXEOX vs. FQEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MXEOX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM (FQEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MXEOX | FQEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.64 | 2.03 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.64 | 9.31 | -4.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.28 | 36.52 | -18.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MXEOX | FQEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.46 | 6.36 | -2.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 1.21 | -0.83 |
Drawdowns
MXEOX vs. FQEMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXEOX drawdown since its inception was -41.05%, which is greater than FQEMX's maximum drawdown of -34.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXEOX and FQEMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXEOX | FQEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.05% | -34.46% | -6.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.95% | -18.93% | +4.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.25% | -18.93% | +1.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.69% | 0.00% | -0.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.18% | -10.77% | -6.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.46% | 4.78% | -1.32% |
Volatility
MXEOX vs. FQEMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Great-West Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MXEOX) is 8.29%, while Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM (FQEMX) has a volatility of 13.19%. This indicates that MXEOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FQEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MXEOX | FQEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.29% | 13.19% | -4.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.98% | 24.43% | -8.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.70% | 27.72% | -9.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.71% | 21.08% | -3.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.13% | 21.08% | -1.95% |
MXEOX vs. FQEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXEOX has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than FQEMX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
MXEOX vs. FQEMX - Dividend Comparison
MXEOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, less than FQEMX's 1.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FQEMX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM | 1.67% | 3.18% | 3.15% | 4.82% | 3.93% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MXEOX Great-West Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 0.76% | 1.00% | 1.36% | 2.01% | 1.61% | 3.42% | 1.85% | 0.94% | 1.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MXEOX and FQEMX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FQEMX has higher volatility (13.19%) compared to MXEOX (8.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXEOX dropped -41.05% vs FQEMX's -34.46%.
FQEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.36 vs 3.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MXEOX and FQEMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer