MXEDX vs. TIBDX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

MXEDX (Great-West Core Strategies: Flexible Bond Fund) and TIBDX (TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, MXEDX returned 0.83%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for TIBDX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MXEDX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for TIBDX.

Performance

MXEDX vs. TIBDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West Core Strategies: Flexible Bond Fund (MXEDX) and TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund (TIBDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXEDX achieves a 0.30% return, which is significantly lower than TIBDX's 0.34% return.

MXEDX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.60%
• YTD: 0.30%
• 6M: 0.41%
• 1Y: 4.95%
• 3Y*: 5.13%
• 5Y*: 0.83%
• 10Y*: —

TIBDX

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 0.60%
• YTD: 0.34%
• 6M: 0.71%
• 1Y: 4.87%
• 3Y*: 4.18%
• 5Y*: 0.09%
• 10Y*: 1.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXEDX vs. TIBDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
MXEDX Great-West Core Strategies: Flexible Bond Fund	0.30%	7.97%	3.28%	6.36%	-12.25%	-1.32%	9.47%	8.10%	-1.50%
TIBDX TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund	0.34%	7.38%	1.95%	5.63%	-13.68%	-0.95%	8.10%	9.57%	0.91%

Correlation

The correlation between MXEDX and TIBDX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2018	0.86

The correlation between MXEDX and TIBDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MXEDX vs. TIBDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXEDX

MXEDX Risk / Return Rank: 29
MXEDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
MXEDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
MXEDX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
MXEDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
MXEDX Martin Ratio Rank: 21

TIBDX

TIBDX Risk / Return Rank: 25
TIBDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
TIBDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
TIBDX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
TIBDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
TIBDX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXEDX vs. TIBDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Core Strategies: Flexible Bond Fund (MXEDX) and TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund (TIBDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MXEDX	TIBDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.48	1.33	+0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.21	1.98	+0.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.24	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.77	1.72	+0.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.94	5.09	-0.16

MXEDX vs. TIBDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXEDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the TIBDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXEDX and TIBDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MXEDX vs. TIBDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXEDX drawdown since its inception was -16.76%, smaller than the maximum TIBDX drawdown of -18.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXEDX and TIBDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MXEDX	TIBDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.76%	-18.82%	+2.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.91%	-2.98%	+0.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.14%	-6.29%	+0.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.63%	-18.82%	+2.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-18.82%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.65%	-1.54%	-0.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.20%	-2.30%	-1.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.02%	1.01%	+0.01%

Volatility

MXEDX vs. TIBDX - Volatility Comparison

Great-West Core Strategies: Flexible Bond Fund (MXEDX) has a higher volatility of 1.17% compared to TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund (TIBDX) at 1.10%. This indicates that MXEDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIBDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MXEDX	TIBDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.17%	1.10%	+0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.71%	2.95%	-0.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.47%	3.88%	-0.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.44%	5.64%	-0.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.75%	4.74%	+0.01%

MXEDX vs. TIBDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXEDX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than TIBDX's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

MXEDX vs. TIBDX - Dividend Comparison

MXEDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.96%, less than TIBDX's 4.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MXEDX Great-West Core Strategies: Flexible Bond Fund	3.96%	3.97%	4.60%	3.39%	1.85%	0.46%	0.01%	2.95%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TIBDX TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund	4.46%	4.34%	3.60%	3.22%	2.44%	2.39%	4.45%	3.09%	2.88%	2.93%	3.80%	4.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MXEDX and TIBDX in my portfolio?

MXEDX and TIBDX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MXEDX or TIBDX?

MXEDX has higher volatility (1.17%) compared to TIBDX (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXEDX dropped -16.76% vs TIBDX's -18.82%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MXEDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.