MXEDX vs. GUGAX
MXEDX (Great-West Core Strategies: Flexible Bond Fund) and GUGAX (GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, MXEDX returned 0.90%/yr vs -0.37%/yr for GUGAX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.45% expense ratio.
Performance
MXEDX vs. GUGAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXEDX achieves a 0.30% return, which is significantly lower than GUGAX's 0.96% return.
MXEDX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 0.51%
- 1Y
- 5.58%
- 3Y*
- 5.20%
- 5Y*
- 0.90%
- 10Y*
- —
GUGAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.96%
- 6M
- 0.99%
- 1Y
- 5.99%
- 3Y*
- 4.32%
- 5Y*
- -0.37%
- 10Y*
- 1.52%
MXEDX vs. GUGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXEDX Great-West Core Strategies: Flexible Bond Fund | 0.30% | 7.97% | 3.28% | 6.36% | -12.25% | -1.32% | 9.47% | 8.10% | -1.50% |
GUGAX GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund | 0.96% | 7.29% | 0.96% | 6.02% | -14.52% | -3.17% | 4.91% | 9.66% | 2.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between MXEDX and GUGAX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2018 | 0.81 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MXEDX and GUGAX has dropped to 0.61 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MXEDX vs. GUGAX — Risk / Return Rank
MXEDX
GUGAX
MXEDX vs. GUGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Core Strategies: Flexible Bond Fund (MXEDX) and GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund (GUGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MXEDX | GUGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.64 | 2.03 | -0.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.47 | 3.31 | -0.84 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.44 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | 4.72 | -2.65 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.38 | 13.88 | -7.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MXEDX | GUGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.64 | 2.03 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | -0.06 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.08 | +0.42 |
Drawdowns
MXEDX vs. GUGAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXEDX drawdown since its inception was -16.76%, smaller than the maximum GUGAX drawdown of -38.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXEDX and GUGAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXEDX | GUGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.76% | -38.57% | +21.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.91% | -1.16% | -1.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.14% | -6.12% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.63% | -20.53% | +3.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -23.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.65% | -6.72% | +5.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.21% | -11.27% | +7.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.94% | 0.43% | +0.51% |
Volatility
MXEDX vs. GUGAX - Volatility Comparison
Great-West Core Strategies: Flexible Bond Fund (MXEDX) has a higher volatility of 1.28% compared to GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund (GUGAX) at 0.00%. This indicates that MXEDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GUGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MXEDX | GUGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.28% | 0.00% | +1.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.57% | 1.44% | +1.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.50% | 3.06% | +0.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.42% | 6.57% | -1.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.75% | 5.43% | -0.68% |
MXEDX vs. GUGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MXEDX and GUGAX have an expense ratio of 0.45%.
Dividends
MXEDX vs. GUGAX - Dividend Comparison
MXEDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.96%, less than GUGAX's 4.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GUGAX GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund | 4.52% | 3.69% | 4.34% | 0.00% | 1.94% | 2.90% | 7.96% | 5.74% | 5.08% | 2.43% | 3.29% | 1.76% |
MXEDX Great-West Core Strategies: Flexible Bond Fund | 3.96% | 3.97% | 4.60% | 3.39% | 1.85% | 0.46% | 0.01% | 2.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MXEDX and GUGAX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MXEDX has higher volatility (1.28%) compared to GUGAX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXEDX dropped -16.76% vs GUGAX's -38.57%.
GUGAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MXEDX and GUGAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer