PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXECX vs. MXBPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXECX vs. MXBPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West Core Strategies: International Equity Fund (MXECX) and Great-West Moderately Aggressive Profile Fund (MXBPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MXECX having a 9.23% return and MXBPX slightly higher at 9.25%.


MXECX

1D
-1.10%
1M
2.04%
6M
4.30%
YTD
9.23%
1Y
20.85%
3Y*
14.68%
5Y*
7.83%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.83%

MXBPX

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.12%
6M
5.84%
YTD
9.25%
1Y
17.06%
3Y*
11.99%
5Y*
6.60%
10Y*
7.52%
ALL TIME*
1.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MXECX vs. MXBPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MXECX
Great-West Core Strategies: International Equity Fund
9.23%29.17%3.12%17.53%-14.33%9.43%8.85%23.05%-14.54%
MXBPX
Great-West Moderately Aggressive Profile Fund
9.25%13.78%9.00%13.96%-13.04%14.39%11.44%20.91%-10.16%

Correlation

The correlation between MXECX and MXBPX is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2018

0.75

The correlation between MXECX and MXBPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXECX vs. MXBPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MXECX
MXECX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
MXECX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXECX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXECX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
MXECX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXECX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

MXBPX
MXBPX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
MXBPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXBPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXBPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
MXBPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXBPX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MXECX vs. MXBPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Core Strategies: International Equity Fund (MXECX) and Great-West Moderately Aggressive Profile Fund (MXBPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MXECXMXBPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.29

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

2.29

-0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.30

7.97

-0.67

MXECX vs. MXBPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXECX Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the MXBPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXECX and MXBPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MXECX vs. MXBPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXECX drawdown since its inception was -33.69%, smaller than the maximum MXBPX drawdown of -55.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXECX and MXBPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXECXMXBPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.69%

-55.80%

+22.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.81%

-7.12%

-3.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.91%

-11.46%

-2.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.49%

-25.51%

-4.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.10%

-0.37%

-0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.71%

-20.86%

+14.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

2.05%

+0.84%

Volatility

MXECX vs. MXBPX - Volatility Comparison

Great-West Core Strategies: International Equity Fund (MXECX) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to Great-West Moderately Aggressive Profile Fund (MXBPX) at 2.25%. This indicates that MXECX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MXBPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXECXMXBPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.05%

2.25%

+1.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.05%

7.76%

+4.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.49%

11.54%

+2.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.77%

13.48%

+3.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.95%

13.66%

+4.29%

MXECX vs. MXBPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXECX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than MXBPX's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXECX vs. MXBPX - Dividend Comparison

MXECX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, less than MXBPX's 5.42% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXBPX
Great-West Moderately Aggressive Profile Fund
5.42%5.92%6.18%5.45%9.89%9.76%8.52%11.28%12.07%4.47%
MXECX
Great-West Core Strategies: International Equity Fund
3.73%4.06%3.31%4.11%3.41%8.33%11.78%4.69%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXECX and MXBPX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MXECX has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to MXBPX (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXECX dropped -33.69% vs MXBPX's -55.80%.

MXECX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXECX and MXBPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer