PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXECX vs. JIJIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXECX vs. JIJIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West Core Strategies: International Equity Fund (MXECX) and John Hancock International Dynamic Growth Fund (JIJIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXECX achieves a 6.44% return, which is significantly lower than JIJIX's 26.05% return.


MXECX

1D
0.16%
1M
3.51%
YTD
6.44%
6M
8.72%
1Y
18.02%
3Y*
15.08%
5Y*
7.06%
10Y*

JIJIX

1D
0.92%
1M
8.42%
YTD
26.05%
6M
28.44%
1Y
39.30%
3Y*
27.22%
5Y*
11.05%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXECX vs. JIJIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MXECX
Great-West Core Strategies: International Equity Fund
6.44%29.17%3.12%17.53%-14.33%9.43%8.85%10.76%
JIJIX
John Hancock International Dynamic Growth Fund
26.05%23.10%24.88%18.92%-31.47%17.94%36.58%13.65%

Correlation

The correlation between MXECX and JIJIX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2019

0.76

The correlation between MXECX and JIJIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXECX vs. JIJIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXECX
MXECX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
MXECX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXECX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXECX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
MXECX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXECX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

JIJIX
JIJIX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
JIJIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JIJIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
JIJIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
JIJIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
JIJIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXECX vs. JIJIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Core Strategies: International Equity Fund (MXECX) and John Hancock International Dynamic Growth Fund (JIJIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MXECXJIJIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.31

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.67

2.43

-0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.09

9.53

-3.44

MXECX vs. JIJIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXECX Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is comparable to the JIJIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXECX and JIJIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MXECXJIJIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26

1.68

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.54

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.74

-0.31

Drawdowns

MXECX vs. JIJIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXECX drawdown since its inception was -33.69%, smaller than the maximum JIJIX drawdown of -41.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXECX and JIJIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXECXJIJIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.69%

-41.80%

+8.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.81%

-16.01%

+5.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.91%

-18.04%

+4.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.49%

-41.80%

+11.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

0.00%

-0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.83%

-11.43%

+4.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

4.08%

-1.19%

Volatility

MXECX vs. JIJIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Great-West Core Strategies: International Equity Fund (MXECX) is 3.99%, while John Hancock International Dynamic Growth Fund (JIJIX) has a volatility of 9.86%. This indicates that MXECX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JIJIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXECXJIJIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.99%

9.86%

-5.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.27%

20.60%

-9.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.28%

23.25%

-8.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.74%

20.48%

-3.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.01%

22.11%

-4.10%

MXECX vs. JIJIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXECX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than JIJIX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXECX vs. JIJIX - Dividend Comparison

MXECX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, more than JIJIX's 2.33% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
JIJIX
John Hancock International Dynamic Growth Fund
2.33%2.94%0.13%0.22%0.79%30.17%5.62%0.20%
MXECX
Great-West Core Strategies: International Equity Fund
3.81%4.06%3.31%4.11%3.41%8.33%11.78%4.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXECX and JIJIX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JIJIX has higher volatility (9.86%) compared to MXECX (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXECX dropped -33.69% vs JIJIX's -41.80%.

JIJIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXECX and JIJIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer