PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXECX vs. FISZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXECX vs. FISZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West Core Strategies: International Equity Fund (MXECX) and Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund (FISZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXECX achieves a 9.23% return, which is significantly lower than FISZX's 20.11% return.


MXECX

1D
-1.10%
1M
2.04%
6M
4.30%
YTD
9.23%
1Y
20.85%
3Y*
14.68%
5Y*
7.83%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.83%

FISZX

1D
-0.39%
1M
-4.89%
6M
11.25%
YTD
20.11%
1Y
35.69%
3Y*
19.42%
5Y*
6.94%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MXECX vs. FISZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MXECX
Great-West Core Strategies: International Equity Fund
9.23%29.17%3.12%17.53%-14.33%9.43%8.85%9.24%
FISZX
Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund
20.11%31.77%3.61%15.83%-28.32%9.91%23.49%13.42%

Correlation

The correlation between MXECX and FISZX is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2019

0.81

The correlation between MXECX and FISZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXECX vs. FISZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MXECX
MXECX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
MXECX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXECX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXECX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
MXECX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXECX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

FISZX
FISZX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FISZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FISZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
FISZX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FISZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FISZX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MXECX vs. FISZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Core Strategies: International Equity Fund (MXECX) and Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund (FISZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MXECXFISZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.29

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

2.45

-0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.30

8.21

-0.91

MXECX vs. FISZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXECX Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the FISZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXECX and FISZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MXECX vs. FISZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXECX drawdown since its inception was -33.69%, smaller than the maximum FISZX drawdown of -39.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXECX and FISZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXECXFISZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.69%

-39.92%

+6.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.81%

-14.48%

+3.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.91%

-14.63%

+0.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.49%

-39.92%

+9.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.10%

-9.41%

+8.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.71%

-12.20%

+5.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

4.30%

-1.41%

Volatility

MXECX vs. FISZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Great-West Core Strategies: International Equity Fund (MXECX) is 4.05%, while Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund (FISZX) has a volatility of 7.74%. This indicates that MXECX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FISZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXECXFISZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.05%

7.74%

-3.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.05%

20.56%

-8.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.49%

22.63%

-8.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.77%

18.71%

-1.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.95%

18.73%

-0.78%

MXECX vs. FISZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXECX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FISZX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXECX vs. FISZX - Dividend Comparison

MXECX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, more than FISZX's 1.60% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FISZX
Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund
1.60%1.92%2.55%1.89%1.37%6.08%0.90%0.27%
MXECX
Great-West Core Strategies: International Equity Fund
3.73%4.06%3.31%4.11%3.41%8.33%11.78%4.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXECX and FISZX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FISZX has higher volatility (7.74%) compared to MXECX (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXECX dropped -33.69% vs FISZX's -39.92%.

FISZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXECX and FISZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer