MXEBX vs. YFSIX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

MXEBX (Great-West Core Strategies: U.S. Equity Fund) and YFSIX (AMG Yacktman Global Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, MXEBX returned 12.14%/yr vs 8.85%/yr for YFSIX. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MXEBX charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for YFSIX.

Performance

MXEBX vs. YFSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West Core Strategies: U.S. Equity Fund (MXEBX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXEBX achieves a 10.80% return, which is significantly lower than YFSIX's 28.24% return.

MXEBX

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: 3.00%
• YTD: 10.80%
• 6M: 10.90%
• 1Y: 26.63%
• 3Y*: 20.54%
• 5Y*: 12.14%
• 10Y*: —

YFSIX

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: 4.17%
• YTD: 28.24%
• 6M: 15.41%
• 1Y: 31.58%
• 3Y*: 17.49%
• 5Y*: 8.85%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXEBX vs. YFSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
MXEBX Great-West Core Strategies: U.S. Equity Fund	10.80%	15.39%	21.55%	23.27%	-15.57%	26.53%	16.92%	30.28%	-14.15%
YFSIX AMG Yacktman Global Fund	28.24%	14.91%	-0.34%	16.64%	-9.15%	13.13%	18.46%	24.40%	-3.48%

Correlation

The correlation between MXEBX and YFSIX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.52
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2018	0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between MXEBX and YFSIX has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

MXEBX vs. YFSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXEBX

MXEBX Risk / Return Rank: 69
MXEBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
MXEBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
MXEBX Omega Ratio Rank: 64
MXEBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
MXEBX Martin Ratio Rank: 75

YFSIX

YFSIX Risk / Return Rank: 34
YFSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
YFSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
YFSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 49
YFSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
YFSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXEBX vs. YFSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Core Strategies: U.S. Equity Fund (MXEBX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MXEBX	YFSIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.36	1.58	+0.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.28	1.73	+1.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.38	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.18	2.37	+0.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.73	7.49	+6.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MXEBX vs. YFSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXEBX Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is higher than the YFSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXEBX and YFSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MXEBX	YFSIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.36	1.58	+0.78
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73	0.58	+0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.68	0.82	-0.14

Drawdowns

MXEBX vs. YFSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXEBX drawdown since its inception was -35.75%, roughly equal to the maximum YFSIX drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXEBX and YFSIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MXEBX	YFSIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.75%	-35.10%	-0.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.78%	-14.20%	+5.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.77%	-14.20%	-4.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.94%	-25.14%	+2.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.58%	-0.00%	-0.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.19%	-4.90%	-0.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.00%	4.47%	-2.47%

Volatility

MXEBX vs. YFSIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Great-West Core Strategies: U.S. Equity Fund (MXEBX) is 2.99%, while AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX) has a volatility of 5.70%. This indicates that MXEBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YFSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MXEBX	YFSIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.99%	5.70%	-2.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.93%	20.75%	-11.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.84%	21.33%	-9.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.92%	15.39%	+1.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.80%	16.25%	+3.55%

MXEBX vs. YFSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXEBX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than YFSIX's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

MXEBX vs. YFSIX - Dividend Comparison

MXEBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, while YFSIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MXEBX Great-West Core Strategies: U.S. Equity Fund	4.73%	5.24%	8.63%	4.31%	7.75%	10.25%	0.50%	1.95%	0.62%	0.00%
YFSIX AMG Yacktman Global Fund	0.00%	0.00%	8.68%	8.02%	4.32%	8.18%	4.76%	6.59%	0.71%	2.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MXEBX and YFSIX in my portfolio?

MXEBX and YFSIX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MXEBX or YFSIX?

YFSIX has higher volatility (5.70%) compared to MXEBX (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXEBX dropped -35.75% vs YFSIX's -35.10%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MXEBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.