PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXBSX vs. FFSZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXBSX vs. FFSZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund (MXBSX) and Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFSZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXBSX achieves a 9.28% return, which is significantly lower than FFSZX's 12.32% return.


MXBSX

1D
0.15%
1M
-0.58%
YTD
9.28%
6M
8.31%
1Y
20.41%
3Y*
15.65%
5Y*
7.73%
10Y*
10.58%

FFSZX

1D
0.12%
1M
-0.35%
YTD
12.32%
6M
11.61%
1Y
27.15%
3Y*
20.26%
5Y*
10.16%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXBSX vs. FFSZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MXBSX
Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund
9.28%17.70%11.16%17.79%-16.61%16.82%13.96%8.80%
FFSZX
Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6
12.32%24.08%14.41%20.78%-18.05%16.81%18.36%9.18%

Correlation

The correlation between MXBSX and FFSZX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2019

0.85

The correlation between MXBSX and FFSZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXBSX vs. FFSZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXBSX
MXBSX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
MXBSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXBSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXBSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
MXBSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXBSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

FFSZX
FFSZX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FFSZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFSZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFSZX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FFSZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFSZX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXBSX vs. FFSZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund (MXBSX) and Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFSZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MXBSXFFSZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.37

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

2.78

-0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.00

12.14

-2.15

MXBSX vs. FFSZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXBSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the FFSZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXBSX and FFSZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MXBSX vs. FFSZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXBSX drawdown since its inception was -31.88%, roughly equal to the maximum FFSZX drawdown of -31.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXBSX and FFSZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXBSXFFSZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.88%

-31.00%

-0.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.80%

-9.77%

+0.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.76%

-15.36%

+0.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.68%

-27.17%

-2.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.64%

-2.39%

+0.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.91%

-5.77%

-0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

2.23%

-0.09%

Volatility

MXBSX vs. FFSZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund (MXBSX) is 4.63%, while Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFSZX) has a volatility of 6.20%. This indicates that MXBSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFSZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXBSXFFSZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.63%

6.20%

-1.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.76%

11.91%

-2.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.89%

13.91%

-1.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.98%

15.22%

+0.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.35%

17.12%

-0.77%

MXBSX vs. FFSZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXBSX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than FFSZX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXBSX vs. FFSZX - Dividend Comparison

MXBSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.82%, less than FFSZX's 5.10% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFSZX
Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6
5.10%3.82%2.92%2.26%8.99%7.98%2.41%1.47%0.00%0.00%
MXBSX
Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund
4.82%5.27%7.38%5.63%10.66%11.14%6.57%9.46%8.18%3.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, MXBSX and FFSZX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FFSZX has higher volatility (6.20%) compared to MXBSX (4.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXBSX dropped -31.88% vs FFSZX's -31.00%.

FFSZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXBSX and FFSZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer