PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXBSX vs. DRIQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXBSX vs. DRIQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund (MXBSX) and Dimensional 2015 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXBSX achieves a 10.55% return, which is significantly higher than DRIQX's 3.01% return. Over the past 10 years, MXBSX has outperformed DRIQX with an annualized return of 10.04%, while DRIQX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.48% annualized return.


MXBSX

1D
1.53%
1M
0.00%
6M
7.31%
YTD
10.55%
1Y
20.51%
3Y*
14.33%
5Y*
7.93%
10Y*
10.04%
ALL TIME*
10.36%

DRIQX

1D
0.35%
1M
-0.44%
6M
1.84%
YTD
3.01%
1Y
6.61%
3Y*
6.44%
5Y*
1.86%
10Y*
4.48%
ALL TIME*
5.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MXBSX vs. DRIQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXBSX
Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund
10.55%17.70%11.16%17.79%-16.61%16.82%13.96%26.31%-10.30%20.41%
DRIQX
Dimensional 2015 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
3.01%8.83%5.47%8.17%-14.79%7.79%14.31%14.08%-4.20%7.82%

Correlation

The correlation between MXBSX and DRIQX is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2016

0.52

Over the past year, MXBSX and DRIQX have become more correlated (0.77) than their long-term average of 0.52, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXBSX vs. DRIQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MXBSX
MXBSX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
MXBSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXBSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXBSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
MXBSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXBSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

DRIQX
DRIQX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
DRIQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRIQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRIQX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
DRIQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRIQX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MXBSX vs. DRIQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund (MXBSX) and Dimensional 2015 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MXBSXDRIQXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.27

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

1.90

+0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.67

7.47

+1.20

MXBSX vs. DRIQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXBSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the DRIQX Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXBSX and DRIQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MXBSX vs. DRIQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXBSX drawdown since its inception was -31.88%, which is greater than DRIQX's maximum drawdown of -19.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXBSX and DRIQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXBSXDRIQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.88%

-19.86%

-12.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.80%

-3.47%

-5.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.76%

-5.12%

-9.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.68%

-19.86%

-9.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.88%

-19.86%

-12.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.85%

-1.30%

+0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.86%

-3.84%

-2.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

0.88%

+1.27%

Volatility

MXBSX vs. DRIQX - Volatility Comparison

Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund (MXBSX) has a higher volatility of 3.10% compared to Dimensional 2015 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIQX) at 1.10%. This indicates that MXBSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRIQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXBSXDRIQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.10%

1.10%

+2.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.88%

3.60%

+6.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.08%

4.52%

+8.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.97%

7.07%

+8.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.33%

6.58%

+9.75%

MXBSX vs. DRIQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXBSX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than DRIQX's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MXBSX vs. DRIQX - Dividend Comparison

MXBSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.77%, less than DRIQX's 6.36% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DRIQX
Dimensional 2015 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
6.36%4.95%4.53%4.28%6.51%4.54%3.76%2.05%2.23%1.66%1.37%
MXBSX
Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund
4.77%5.27%7.38%5.63%10.66%11.14%6.57%9.46%8.18%3.54%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXBSX and DRIQX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MXBSX has higher volatility (3.10%) compared to DRIQX (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXBSX dropped -31.88% vs DRIQX's -19.86%.

DRIQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXBSX and DRIQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer