MXBGX vs. URFFX
MXBGX (Great-West Lifetime 2040 Fund) and URFFX (USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 10 years, MXBGX returned 9.25%/yr vs 10.12%/yr for URFFX. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. MXBGX charges 0.11%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for URFFX.
Performance
MXBGX vs. URFFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXBGX achieves a 9.12% return, which is significantly lower than URFFX's 13.05% return. Over the past 10 years, MXBGX has underperformed URFFX with an annualized return of 9.25%, while URFFX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.12% annualized return.
MXBGX
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- 6M
- 6.34%
- YTD
- 9.12%
- 1Y
- 18.08%
- 3Y*
- 13.04%
- 5Y*
- 7.09%
- 10Y*
- 9.25%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.58%
URFFX
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- 6M
- 9.62%
- YTD
- 13.05%
- 1Y
- 24.29%
- 3Y*
- 16.22%
- 5Y*
- 9.38%
- 10Y*
- 10.12%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.09%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
MXBGX vs. URFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXBGX Great-West Lifetime 2040 Fund | 9.12% | 16.19% | 10.17% | 16.47% | -15.90% | 15.69% | 13.61% | 25.22% | -9.48% | 18.42% |
URFFX USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund | 13.05% | 19.35% | 11.86% | 18.12% | -15.66% | 17.70% | 10.52% | 20.16% | -9.01% | 19.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between MXBGX and URFFX is 0.95, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2016 | 0.83 |
The correlation between MXBGX and URFFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (10 years) to 0.95 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MXBGX vs. URFFX — Risk / Return Rank
MXBGX
URFFX
MXBGX vs. URFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Lifetime 2040 Fund (MXBGX) and USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund (URFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MXBGX | URFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.35 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | 2.87 | -0.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.52 | 12.30 | -3.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MXBGX vs. URFFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXBGX drawdown since its inception was -30.12%, smaller than the maximum URFFX drawdown of -44.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXBGX and URFFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXBGX | URFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.12% | -44.25% | +14.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.98% | -7.89% | -0.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.05% | -14.14% | +1.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.13% | -23.76% | -4.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.12% | -29.97% | -0.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.77% | -0.17% | -0.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.53% | -5.88% | +0.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 1.84% | +0.10% |
Volatility
MXBGX vs. URFFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Great-West Lifetime 2040 Fund (MXBGX) is 2.72%, while USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund (URFFX) has a volatility of 2.93%. This indicates that MXBGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MXBGX | URFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.72% | 2.93% | -0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.79% | 9.82% | -1.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.61% | 11.86% | -0.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.49% | 13.97% | +0.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.06% | 14.33% | +0.73% |
MXBGX vs. URFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXBGX has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than URFFX's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
MXBGX vs. URFFX - Dividend Comparison
MXBGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%, less than URFFX's 5.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXBGX Great-West Lifetime 2040 Fund | 4.60% | 5.02% | 6.86% | 5.77% | 11.05% | 10.66% | 6.43% | 9.53% | 7.86% | 5.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
URFFX USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund | 5.72% | 6.46% | 2.61% | 3.39% | 11.40% | 8.13% | 6.25% | 11.76% | 10.21% | 5.55% | 3.91% | 2.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, MXBGX and URFFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
URFFX has higher volatility (2.93%) compared to MXBGX (2.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXBGX dropped -30.12% vs URFFX's -44.25%.
URFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MXBGX and URFFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer