PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXBGX vs. MXBPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXBGX vs. MXBPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West Lifetime 2040 Fund (MXBGX) and Great-West Moderately Aggressive Profile Fund (MXBPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MXBGX having a 6.76% return and MXBPX slightly lower at 6.43%. Over the past 10 years, MXBGX has outperformed MXBPX with an annualized return of 9.22%, while MXBPX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.31% annualized return.


MXBGX

1D
-2.24%
1M
-0.71%
YTD
6.76%
6M
7.46%
1Y
17.67%
3Y*
14.08%
5Y*
6.77%
10Y*
9.22%

MXBPX

1D
-1.85%
1M
-0.38%
YTD
6.43%
6M
7.24%
1Y
15.30%
3Y*
12.59%
5Y*
6.08%
10Y*
7.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXBGX vs. MXBPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXBGX
Great-West Lifetime 2040 Fund
6.76%16.19%10.17%16.47%-15.90%15.69%13.61%25.22%-9.48%18.42%
MXBPX
Great-West Moderately Aggressive Profile Fund
6.43%13.78%9.00%13.96%-13.04%14.39%11.44%20.91%-8.67%13.52%

Correlation

The correlation between MXBGX and MXBPX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2016

0.97

The correlation between MXBGX and MXBPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXBGX vs. MXBPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXBGX
MXBGX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
MXBGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXBGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXBGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
MXBGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXBGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

MXBPX
MXBPX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
MXBPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXBPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXBPX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
MXBPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXBPX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXBGX vs. MXBPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Lifetime 2040 Fund (MXBGX) and Great-West Moderately Aggressive Profile Fund (MXBPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MXBGXMXBPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.29

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.30

2.25

+0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.60

7.81

+1.79

MXBGX vs. MXBPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXBGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the MXBPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXBGX and MXBPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MXBGXMXBPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64

1.42

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.45

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.54

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.12

+0.51

Drawdowns

MXBGX vs. MXBPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXBGX drawdown since its inception was -30.12%, smaller than the maximum MXBPX drawdown of -55.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXBGX and MXBPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXBGXMXBPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.12%

-55.80%

+25.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.98%

-7.12%

-0.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.05%

-11.46%

-1.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.13%

-25.51%

-2.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.12%

-28.63%

-1.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.32%

-1.85%

-0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.60%

-20.97%

+15.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

2.05%

-0.14%

Volatility

MXBGX vs. MXBPX - Volatility Comparison

Great-West Lifetime 2040 Fund (MXBGX) has a higher volatility of 3.47% compared to Great-West Moderately Aggressive Profile Fund (MXBPX) at 3.12%. This indicates that MXBGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MXBPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXBGXMXBPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.47%

3.12%

+0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.29%

7.38%

+0.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.18%

11.28%

-0.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.46%

13.46%

+1.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.13%

13.70%

+1.43%

MXBGX vs. MXBPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXBGX has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than MXBPX's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXBGX vs. MXBPX - Dividend Comparison

MXBGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, less than MXBPX's 5.57% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXBGX
Great-West Lifetime 2040 Fund
4.70%5.02%6.86%5.77%11.05%10.66%6.43%9.53%7.86%5.21%
MXBPX
Great-West Moderately Aggressive Profile Fund
5.57%5.92%6.18%5.45%9.89%9.76%8.52%11.28%12.07%4.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, MXBGX and MXBPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MXBGX has higher volatility (3.47%) compared to MXBPX (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXBGX dropped -30.12% vs MXBPX's -55.80%.

MXBGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXBGX and MXBPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer