PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXAKX vs. JIEHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXAKX vs. JIEHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West Lifetime 2020 Fund (MXAKX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2060 Lifetime Portfolio (JIEHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXAKX achieves a 5.17% return, which is significantly lower than JIEHX's 11.43% return.


MXAKX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.18%
6M
3.45%
YTD
5.17%
1Y
10.59%
3Y*
9.08%
5Y*
4.41%
10Y*
6.38%
ALL TIME*
6.55%

JIEHX

1D
0.29%
1M
-0.05%
6M
7.53%
YTD
11.43%
1Y
23.16%
3Y*
16.97%
5Y*
9.45%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MXAKX vs. JIEHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXAKX
Great-West Lifetime 2020 Fund
5.17%11.13%7.06%11.54%-12.68%9.78%11.50%17.31%-5.19%11.69%
JIEHX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2060 Lifetime Portfolio
11.43%20.12%15.37%18.47%-18.03%18.48%16.08%25.00%-8.22%16.82%

Correlation

The correlation between MXAKX and JIEHX is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.80

The correlation between MXAKX and JIEHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (all time) to 0.93 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXAKX vs. JIEHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MXAKX
MXAKX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
MXAKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXAKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXAKX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
MXAKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXAKX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

JIEHX
JIEHX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
JIEHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JIEHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
JIEHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
JIEHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
JIEHX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MXAKX vs. JIEHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Lifetime 2020 Fund (MXAKX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2060 Lifetime Portfolio (JIEHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MXAKXJIEHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.30

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

2.38

-0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.55

10.06

-1.51

MXAKX vs. JIEHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXAKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the JIEHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXAKX and JIEHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MXAKX vs. JIEHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXAKX drawdown since its inception was -21.92%, smaller than the maximum JIEHX drawdown of -32.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXAKX and JIEHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXAKXJIEHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.92%

-32.55%

+10.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.93%

-9.18%

+4.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.14%

-16.15%

+9.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.92%

-25.70%

+3.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.61%

-1.30%

+0.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.02%

-4.93%

+0.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.21%

2.17%

-0.96%

Volatility

MXAKX vs. JIEHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Great-West Lifetime 2020 Fund (MXAKX) is 1.60%, while John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2060 Lifetime Portfolio (JIEHX) has a volatility of 3.68%. This indicates that MXAKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JIEHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXAKXJIEHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.60%

3.68%

-2.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.29%

11.03%

-5.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.01%

13.25%

-6.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.40%

15.40%

-6.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.19%

16.44%

-7.25%

MXAKX vs. JIEHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXAKX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than JIEHX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MXAKX vs. JIEHX - Dividend Comparison

MXAKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, more than JIEHX's 3.18% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
JIEHX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2060 Lifetime Portfolio
3.18%3.55%1.76%2.17%6.57%5.15%3.18%6.88%6.99%1.76%
MXAKX
Great-West Lifetime 2020 Fund
4.51%4.75%4.34%5.07%8.97%8.35%4.90%7.05%6.16%2.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, MXAKX and JIEHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JIEHX has higher volatility (3.68%) compared to MXAKX (1.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXAKX dropped -21.92% vs JIEHX's -32.55%.

JIEHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXAKX and JIEHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer