36BZ.DE vs. CNYA
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (36BZ.DE) and iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA).
36BZ.DE and CNYA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. 36BZ.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A Inclusion. It was launched on Apr 8, 2015. CNYA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A Inclusion Index. It was launched on Jun 13, 2016. Both 36BZ.DE and CNYA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: 36BZ.DE or CNYA.
Performance
36BZ.DE vs. CNYA - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
36BZ.DE:
0.32
CNYA:
0.49
36BZ.DE:
0.70
CNYA:
0.98
36BZ.DE:
1.10
CNYA:
1.16
36BZ.DE:
0.22
CNYA:
0.38
36BZ.DE:
0.58
CNYA:
0.87
36BZ.DE:
16.40%
CNYA:
21.02%
36BZ.DE:
28.54%
CNYA:
33.77%
36BZ.DE:
-53.30%
CNYA:
-49.48%
36BZ.DE:
-31.62%
CNYA:
-34.19%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 36BZ.DE achieves a -7.87% return, which is significantly lower than CNYA's 5.08% return.
36BZ.DE
- YTD
- -7.87%
- 1M
- 1.96%
- 6M
- -2.03%
- 1Y
- 9.08%
- 3Y*
- -8.49%
- 5Y*
- -2.74%
- 10Y*
- -0.66%
CNYA
- YTD
- 5.08%
- 1M
- 3.63%
- 6M
- 11.56%
- 1Y
- 16.52%
- 3Y*
- -3.93%
- 5Y*
- -2.25%
- 10Y*
- N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
36BZ.DE vs. CNYA - Expense Ratio Comparison
36BZ.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than CNYA's 0.60% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
36BZ.DE vs. CNYA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
36BZ.DE
CNYA
36BZ.DE vs. CNYA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (36BZ.DE) and iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Correlation
The correlation between 36BZ.DE and CNYA is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
36BZ.DE vs. CNYA - Dividend Comparison
36BZ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CNYA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
36BZ.DE iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CNYA iShares MSCI China A ETF | 2.52% | 2.51% | 4.23% | 2.69% | 1.11% | 1.05% | 1.21% | 3.92% | 0.98% | 1.38% |
Drawdowns
36BZ.DE vs. CNYA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 36BZ.DE drawdown since its inception was -53.30%, which is greater than CNYA's maximum drawdown of -49.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 36BZ.DE and CNYA.
Loading data...
Volatility
36BZ.DE vs. CNYA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (36BZ.DE) is 2.65%, while iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) has a volatility of 3.20%. This indicates that 36BZ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNYA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...