PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MWOP.DE vs. CBUM.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MWOP.DE vs. CBUM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI World ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Acc (MWOP.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Scored and Screened UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (CBUM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MWOP.DE achieves a 13.15% return, which is significantly higher than CBUM.DE's 6.79% return.


MWOP.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.35%
6M
9.88%
YTD
13.15%
1Y
25.30%
3Y*
17.46%
5Y*
10Y*

CBUM.DE

1D
-1.48%
1M
-1.70%
6M
6.13%
YTD
6.79%
1Y
18.98%
3Y*
16.58%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MWOP.DE vs. CBUM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
MWOP.DE
Amundi MSCI World ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Acc
13.15%7.50%23.56%8.87%
CBUM.DE
iShares S&P 500 Scored and Screened UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)
6.79%15.88%21.99%8.32%

Correlation

The correlation between MWOP.DE and CBUM.DE is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2023

0.80

The correlation between MWOP.DE and CBUM.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MWOP.DE vs. CBUM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MWOP.DE
MWOP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
MWOP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MWOP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
MWOP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
MWOP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
MWOP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

CBUM.DE
CBUM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
CBUM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MWOP.DE vs. CBUM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI World ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Acc (MWOP.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Scored and Screened UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (CBUM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MWOP.DECBUM.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.29

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.73

2.10

+0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.57

8.78

+1.78

MWOP.DE vs. CBUM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MWOP.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the CBUM.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MWOP.DE and CBUM.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MWOP.DE vs. CBUM.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MWOP.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.85%, which is greater than CBUM.DE's maximum drawdown of -19.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MWOP.DE and CBUM.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MWOP.DECBUM.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.85%

-19.25%

-2.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.30%

-8.99%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.85%

-19.25%

-2.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.44%

-2.37%

+0.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.90%

-3.56%

+0.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.40%

2.16%

+0.24%

Volatility

MWOP.DE vs. CBUM.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI World ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Acc (MWOP.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.19% compared to iShares S&P 500 Scored and Screened UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (CBUM.DE) at 2.99%. This indicates that MWOP.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBUM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MWOP.DECBUM.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.19%

2.99%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.52%

9.37%

+0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.74%

12.09%

+0.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.88%

14.98%

-1.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.88%

14.98%

-1.10%

MWOP.DE vs. CBUM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

MWOP.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than CBUM.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MWOP.DE vs. CBUM.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither MWOP.DE nor CBUM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


MWOP.DE and CBUM.DE have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CBUM.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CBUM.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for MWOP.DE.

MWOP.DE is categorized as ESG, while CBUM.DE is S&P 500. MWOP.DE tracks MSCI World ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped Index, while CBUM.DE tracks S&P 500 Scored & Screened Index (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for MWOP.DE and 0.10% for CBUM.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MWOP.DE and CBUM.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer