MWOFX vs. MEIKX
MWOFX (MFS Global Growth Fund) and MEIKX (MFS Value Fund) are both mutual funds - MWOFX is a Global Equities fund managed by MFS, while MEIKX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by MFS. Over the past 10 years, MWOFX returned 10.76%/yr vs 10.87%/yr for MEIKX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MWOFX charges 1.22%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for MEIKX.
Performance
MWOFX vs. MEIKX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MWOFX achieves a -5.39% return, which is significantly lower than MEIKX's 6.83% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MWOFX having a 10.76% annualized return and MEIKX not far ahead at 10.87%.
MWOFX
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -2.12%
- YTD
- -5.39%
- 6M
- -6.28%
- 1Y
- -1.30%
- 3Y*
- 6.47%
- 5Y*
- 3.02%
- 10Y*
- 10.76%
MEIKX
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 1.53%
- YTD
- 6.83%
- 6M
- 5.69%
- 1Y
- 14.43%
- 3Y*
- 13.73%
- 5Y*
- 8.60%
- 10Y*
- 10.87%
MWOFX vs. MEIKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MWOFX MFS Global Growth Fund | -5.39% | 7.17% | 10.68% | 20.63% | -19.28% | 18.33% | 20.23% | 35.37% | -4.94% | 31.13% |
MEIKX MFS Value Fund | 6.83% | 13.37% | 11.98% | 8.32% | -5.92% | 25.59% | 4.09% | 30.18% | -9.81% | 17.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between MWOFX and MEIKX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2006 | 0.86 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MWOFX and MEIKX has dropped to 0.65 - well below their long-term average of 0.86, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MWOFX vs. MEIKX — Risk / Return Rank
MWOFX
MEIKX
MWOFX vs. MEIKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Global Growth Fund (MWOFX) and MFS Value Fund (MEIKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MWOFX | MEIKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.26 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.06 | 2.29 | -2.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.17 | 7.89 | -8.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MWOFX vs. MEIKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MWOFX drawdown since its inception was -56.10%, roughly equal to the maximum MEIKX drawdown of -56.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MWOFX and MEIKX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MWOFX | MEIKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.10% | -56.81% | +0.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.82% | -6.76% | -7.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.45% | -13.15% | -3.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.64% | -17.50% | -10.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.68% | -36.68% | +5.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.66% | -1.16% | -6.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.90% | -9.42% | -2.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.70% | 1.96% | +2.74% |
Volatility
MWOFX vs. MEIKX - Volatility Comparison
MFS Global Growth Fund (MWOFX) has a higher volatility of 4.47% compared to MFS Value Fund (MEIKX) at 3.24%. This indicates that MWOFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MEIKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MWOFX | MEIKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.47% | 3.24% | +1.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.09% | 7.86% | +2.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.42% | 10.62% | +1.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.88% | 13.92% | +1.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.56% | 16.51% | +0.05% |
MWOFX vs. MEIKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MWOFX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than MEIKX's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
MWOFX vs. MEIKX - Dividend Comparison
MWOFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.73%, less than MEIKX's 9.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MEIKX MFS Value Fund | 9.26% | 9.72% | 9.49% | 8.58% | 7.77% | 3.43% | 2.75% | 3.28% | 3.76% | 4.14% | 3.84% | 6.12% |
MWOFX MFS Global Growth Fund | 5.73% | 5.42% | 5.14% | 2.09% | 3.60% | 6.25% | 3.13% | 1.86% | 5.00% | 3.43% | 1.68% | 6.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MWOFX and MEIKX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MWOFX has higher volatility (4.47%) compared to MEIKX (3.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MWOFX dropped -56.10% vs MEIKX's -56.81%.
MEIKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MWOFX and MEIKX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer