PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MWOFX vs. GQRIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MWOFX vs. GQRIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Global Growth Fund (MWOFX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund Institutional Shares (GQRIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MWOFX achieves a -3.39% return, which is significantly lower than GQRIX's 6.55% return.


MWOFX

1D
-1.29%
1M
0.42%
YTD
-3.39%
6M
-3.00%
1Y
1.87%
3Y*
7.57%
5Y*
3.71%
10Y*
10.31%

GQRIX

1D
-1.12%
1M
-1.64%
YTD
6.55%
6M
7.46%
1Y
7.57%
3Y*
13.80%
5Y*
9.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MWOFX vs. GQRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MWOFX
MFS Global Growth Fund
-3.39%7.17%10.68%20.63%-19.28%18.33%20.23%17.79%
GQRIX
GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund Institutional Shares
6.55%0.91%20.18%19.79%-3.64%17.13%14.75%12.84%

Correlation

The correlation between MWOFX and GQRIX is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2019

0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between MWOFX and GQRIX has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MWOFX vs. GQRIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MWOFX
MWOFX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
MWOFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MWOFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
MWOFX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
MWOFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
MWOFX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

GQRIX
GQRIX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
GQRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
GQRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MWOFX vs. GQRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Global Growth Fund (MWOFX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund Institutional Shares (GQRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MWOFXGQRIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.13

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.16

1.27

-1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.51

2.67

-2.16

MWOFX vs. GQRIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MWOFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.19, which is lower than the GQRIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MWOFX and GQRIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MWOFXGQRIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

0.76

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

0.65

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.70

-0.22

Drawdowns

MWOFX vs. GQRIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MWOFX drawdown since its inception was -56.10%, which is greater than GQRIX's maximum drawdown of -28.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MWOFX and GQRIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MWOFXGQRIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.10%

-28.86%

-27.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.82%

-5.40%

-8.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.45%

-16.47%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.64%

-20.29%

-7.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.71%

-4.53%

-1.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.91%

-4.90%

-7.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.42%

2.57%

+1.85%

Volatility

MWOFX vs. GQRIX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Global Growth Fund (MWOFX) has a higher volatility of 3.34% compared to GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund Institutional Shares (GQRIX) at 2.90%. This indicates that MWOFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MWOFXGQRIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.34%

2.90%

+0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.45%

6.96%

+2.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.13%

9.02%

+3.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.81%

14.68%

+1.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.62%

17.26%

-0.64%

MWOFX vs. GQRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MWOFX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than GQRIX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

MWOFX vs. GQRIX - Dividend Comparison

MWOFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.61%, less than GQRIX's 7.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GQRIX
GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund Institutional Shares
7.46%7.94%6.46%1.39%2.99%1.65%0.11%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MWOFX
MFS Global Growth Fund
5.61%5.42%5.14%2.09%3.60%6.25%3.13%1.86%5.00%3.43%1.68%6.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


MWOFX and GQRIX have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MWOFX has higher volatility (3.34%) compared to GQRIX (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MWOFX dropped -56.10% vs GQRIX's -28.86%.

GQRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.76 vs 0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MWOFX and GQRIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer