MWOFX vs. CFIPX
Compare and contrast key facts about MFS Global Growth Fund (MWOFX) and Franklin Global Equity Fund (CFIPX).
MWOFX is managed by MFS. It was launched on Nov 17, 1993. CFIPX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Feb 28, 1991.
Performance
MWOFX vs. CFIPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MWOFX vs. CFIPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MWOFX MFS Global Growth Fund | -11.70% | 7.17% | 10.68% | 20.63% | -19.28% | 18.33% | 20.23% | 35.37% | -4.94% | 31.13% |
CFIPX Franklin Global Equity Fund | -5.00% | 23.21% | 24.28% | 23.03% | -16.36% | 24.76% | 13.34% | 30.63% | -12.16% | 23.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MWOFX achieves a -11.70% return, which is significantly lower than CFIPX's -5.00% return. Over the past 10 years, MWOFX has underperformed CFIPX with an annualized return of 9.51%, while CFIPX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.61% annualized return.
MWOFX
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -10.16%
- YTD
- -11.70%
- 6M
- -10.64%
- 1Y
- -1.93%
- 3Y*
- 5.19%
- 5Y*
- 3.15%
- 10Y*
- 9.51%
CFIPX
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -7.68%
- YTD
- -5.00%
- 6M
- -1.63%
- 1Y
- 19.21%
- 3Y*
- 18.74%
- 5Y*
- 11.49%
- 10Y*
- 12.61%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MWOFX vs. CFIPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MWOFX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is lower than CFIPX's 1.30% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MWOFX vs. CFIPX — Risk / Return Rank
MWOFX
CFIPX
MWOFX vs. CFIPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Global Growth Fund (MWOFX) and Franklin Global Equity Fund (CFIPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MWOFX | CFIPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | 1.16 | -1.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | 1.70 | -1.75 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.26 | -0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.24 | 1.48 | -1.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.88 | 7.64 | -8.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MWOFX | CFIPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 | 1.16 | -1.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | 0.72 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.73 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.34 | +0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between MWOFX and CFIPX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MWOFX vs. CFIPX - Dividend Comparison
MWOFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.14%, less than CFIPX's 6.75% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MWOFX MFS Global Growth Fund | 6.14% | 5.42% | 5.14% | 2.09% | 3.60% | 6.25% | 3.13% | 1.86% | 5.00% | 3.43% | 1.68% | 6.08% |
CFIPX Franklin Global Equity Fund | 6.75% | 6.41% | 3.49% | 0.99% | 4.99% | 8.99% | 0.73% | 13.31% | 7.86% | 0.77% | 1.52% | 1.01% |
Drawdowns
MWOFX vs. CFIPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MWOFX drawdown since its inception was -56.10%, smaller than the maximum CFIPX drawdown of -62.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MWOFX and CFIPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MWOFX | CFIPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.10% | -62.70% | +6.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.82% | -11.82% | -2.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.64% | -24.44% | -3.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.68% | -33.98% | +2.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.82% | -8.28% | -5.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.94% | -16.50% | +4.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.71% | 2.29% | +1.42% |
Volatility
MWOFX vs. CFIPX - Volatility Comparison
MFS Global Growth Fund (MWOFX) and Franklin Global Equity Fund (CFIPX) have volatilities of 4.28% and 4.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MWOFX | CFIPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.28% | 4.40% | -0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.73% | 8.99% | -0.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.82% | 16.89% | -1.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.69% | 16.08% | -0.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.56% | 17.23% | -0.67% |