MWEP.L vs. SMH.L
MWEP.L (Invesco MSCI World Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc) and SMH.L (VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MWEP.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Equal Weighted Index, while SMH.L is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MarketVector US Listed Semiconductor 10% Capped Screened Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, MWEP.L returned 17.34% vs 112.62% for SMH.L. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MWEP.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.L.
Performance
MWEP.L vs. SMH.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
MWEP.L is traded in GBp, while SMH.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SMH.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MWEP.L achieves a 9.31% return, which is significantly lower than SMH.L's 67.17% return.
MWEP.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.30%
- 6M
- 5.88%
- YTD
- 9.31%
- 1Y
- 17.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMH.L
- 1D
- -3.69%
- 1M
- -13.67%
- 6M
- 47.12%
- YTD
- 67.17%
- 1Y
- 112.62%
- 3Y*
- 50.58%
- 5Y*
- 34.76%
- 10Y*
- —
MWEP.L vs. SMH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MWEP.L Invesco MSCI World Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc | 9.31% | 13.60% | -20.16% |
SMH.L VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF | 67.17% | 38.57% | 9.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between MWEP.L and SMH.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2024 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MWEP.L vs. SMH.L — Risk / Return Rank
MWEP.L
SMH.L
MWEP.L vs. SMH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI World Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (MWEP.L) and VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MWEP.L | SMH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.45 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.26 | 6.26 | -4.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.87 | 24.91 | -16.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MWEP.L vs. SMH.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MWEP.L drawdown since its inception was -27.56%, smaller than the maximum SMH.L drawdown of -36.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MWEP.L and SMH.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MWEP.L | SMH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.56% | -36.36% | +8.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.71% | -17.88% | +10.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -36.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.03% | -17.88% | +16.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.21% | -9.76% | -3.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.96% | 4.50% | -2.54% |
Volatility
MWEP.L vs. SMH.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco MSCI World Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (MWEP.L) is 2.85%, while VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMH.L) has a volatility of 15.83%. This indicates that MWEP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MWEP.L | SMH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.85% | 15.83% | -12.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.83% | 30.18% | -21.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.68% | 36.47% | -25.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.67% | 32.38% | -11.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.67% | 31.78% | -11.11% |
MWEP.L vs. SMH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MWEP.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SMH.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
MWEP.L vs. SMH.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither MWEP.L nor SMH.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MWEP.L and SMH.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MWEP.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MWEP.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMH.L.
MWEP.L is categorized as Global Equities, while SMH.L is Semiconductors. MWEP.L tracks MSCI World Equal Weighted Index, while SMH.L tracks MarketVector US Listed Semiconductor 10% Capped Screened Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for MWEP.L and 0.35% for SMH.L.
Find the right allocation for MWEP.L and SMH.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer