MVUS.L vs. SPLW.L
MVUS.L (iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and SPLW.L (Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF Acc) are both S&P 500 funds - MVUS.L tracks the S&P 500 Index while SPLW.L tracks the S&P 500 Low Vol NTR Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MVUS.L returned 10.84%/yr vs 4.58%/yr for SPLW.L. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MVUS.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for SPLW.L.
Performance
MVUS.L vs. SPLW.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
MVUS.L is traded in GBp, while SPLW.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPLW.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MVUS.L achieves a 4.45% return, which is significantly higher than SPLW.L's 1.40% return.
MVUS.L
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 4.90%
- YTD
- 4.45%
- 6M
- 4.88%
- 1Y
- 12.53%
- 3Y*
- 10.84%
- 5Y*
- 10.08%
- 10Y*
- 11.39%
SPLW.L
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -1.08%
- YTD
- 1.40%
- 6M
- 0.83%
- 1Y
- 1.38%
- 3Y*
- 4.58%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MVUS.L vs. SPLW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MVUS.L iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 4.45% | 3.88% | 20.71% | 3.83% | -0.36% | 13.28% |
SPLW.L Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF Acc | 1.40% | -2.66% | 15.44% | -5.47% | 7.10% | 13.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between MVUS.L and SPLW.L is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2021 | 0.73 |
The correlation between MVUS.L and SPLW.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MVUS.L vs. SPLW.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MVUS.L
SPLW.L
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
MVUS.L
SPLW.L
Financial Services
MVUS.L
SPLW.L
Healthcare
MVUS.L
SPLW.L
Consumer Defensive
MVUS.L
SPLW.L
Consumer Cyclical
MVUS.L
SPLW.L
Communication Services
MVUS.L
SPLW.L
Industrials
MVUS.L
SPLW.L
Energy
MVUS.L
SPLW.L
Utilities
MVUS.L
SPLW.L
Basic Materials
MVUS.L
SPLW.L
Real Estate
MVUS.L
SPLW.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MVUS.L vs. SPLW.L — Risk / Return Rank
MVUS.L
SPLW.L
MVUS.L vs. SPLW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (MVUS.L) and Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF Acc (SPLW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MVUS.L | SPLW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.03 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.32 | 0.18 | +2.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.24 | 0.45 | +6.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MVUS.L | SPLW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.55 | 0.12 | +1.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.95 | 0.43 | +0.52 |
Drawdowns
MVUS.L vs. SPLW.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MVUS.L drawdown since its inception was -24.85%, which is greater than SPLW.L's maximum drawdown of -14.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVUS.L and SPLW.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MVUS.L | SPLW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.85% | -14.28% | -10.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.39% | -7.56% | +2.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.19% | -10.82% | -3.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.19% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -7.04% | +7.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.44% | -5.84% | +2.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.73% | 3.03% | -1.30% |
Volatility
MVUS.L vs. SPLW.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (MVUS.L) is 2.24%, while Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF Acc (SPLW.L) has a volatility of 3.98%. This indicates that MVUS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPLW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MVUS.L | SPLW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.24% | 3.98% | -1.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.65% | 8.70% | -3.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.05% | 11.19% | -3.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.72% | 12.99% | -1.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.78% | 12.99% | +0.79% |
MVUS.L vs. SPLW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MVUS.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SPLW.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MVUS.L vs. SPLW.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither MVUS.L nor SPLW.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MVUS.L and SPLW.L have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MVUS.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MVUS.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for SPLW.L.
MVUS.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while SPLW.L tracks S&P 500 Low Vol NTR Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for MVUS.L and 0.25% for SPLW.L.
Find the right allocation for MVUS.L and SPLW.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer