MVST vs. QBTS
MVST (Microvast Holdings, Inc.) and QBTS (D-Wave Quantum Inc) are both stocks. MVST operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials), while QBTS operates in Computer Hardware (Technology). Over the past 3 years, MVST returned -10.38%/yr vs 123.62%/yr for QBTS. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MVST vs. QBTS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MVST achieves a -59.64% return, which is significantly lower than QBTS's -10.63% return.
MVST
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -25.66%
- YTD
- -59.64%
- 6M
- -62.46%
- 1Y
- -73.10%
- 3Y*
- -10.38%
- 5Y*
- -39.10%
- 10Y*
- —
QBTS
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- 9.00%
- YTD
- -10.63%
- 6M
- -10.46%
- 1Y
- 47.17%
- 3Y*
- 123.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MVST vs. QBTS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MVST Microvast Holdings, Inc. | -59.64% | 35.27% | 47.86% | -8.50% | -43.96% |
QBTS D-Wave Quantum Inc | -10.63% | 211.31% | 854.44% | -38.88% | -83.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between MVST and QBTS is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2022 | 0.27 |
Over the past year, MVST and QBTS have become more correlated (0.51) than their long-term average of 0.27, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
MVST:
$435.36M
QBTS:
$8.59B
MVST:
-$0.27
QBTS:
-$1.08
MVST:
1.04
QBTS:
637.12
MVST:
0.93
QBTS:
7.64
MVST:
$371.64M
QBTS:
$12.44M
MVST:
$130.76M
QBTS:
$8.25M
MVST:
-$5.47M
QBTS:
-$399.03M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MVST vs. QBTS — Risk / Return Rank
MVST
QBTS
MVST vs. QBTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Microvast Holdings, Inc. (MVST) and D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MVST | QBTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.16 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.89 | 0.67 | -1.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.40 | 1.16 | -2.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MVST vs. QBTS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MVST drawdown since its inception was -99.34%, roughly equal to the maximum QBTS drawdown of -96.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVST and QBTS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MVST | QBTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.34% | -96.67% | -2.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -82.34% | -71.01% | -11.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -94.40% | -79.17% | -15.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -98.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.39% | -47.81% | -47.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.32% | -65.66% | +2.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 52.31% | 40.64% | +11.67% |
Volatility
MVST vs. QBTS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Microvast Holdings, Inc. (MVST) is 26.91%, while D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS) has a volatility of 42.66%. This indicates that MVST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QBTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MVST | QBTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.91% | 42.66% | -15.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 77.64% | 76.89% | +0.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 95.37% | 108.46% | -13.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 187.75% | 150.99% | +36.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 159.77% | 150.99% | +8.78% |
Dividends
MVST vs. QBTS - Dividend Comparison
Neither MVST nor QBTS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
MVST vs. QBTS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Microvast Holdings, Inc. and D-Wave Quantum Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
MVST and QBTS have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QBTS has higher volatility (42.66%) compared to MVST (26.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MVST dropped -99.34% vs QBTS's -96.67%.
QBTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.44 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MVST and QBTS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer