PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MVOL.L vs. ISWD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MVOL.L vs. ISWD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS (MVOL.L) and iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ISWD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MVOL.L is traded in USD, while ISWD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ISWD.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVOL.L achieves a 0.67% return, which is significantly lower than ISWD.L's 19.77% return. Over the past 10 years, MVOL.L has underperformed ISWD.L with an annualized return of 7.05%, while ISWD.L has yielded a comparatively higher 11.76% annualized return.


MVOL.L

1D
0.04%
1M
0.76%
YTD
0.67%
6M
1.44%
1Y
1.44%
3Y*
9.30%
5Y*
5.18%
10Y*
7.05%

ISWD.L

1D
-0.20%
1M
8.70%
YTD
19.77%
6M
21.01%
1Y
37.31%
3Y*
18.86%
5Y*
12.48%
10Y*
11.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MVOL.L vs. ISWD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MVOL.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS
0.67%11.02%11.08%7.28%-9.62%14.65%2.56%22.56%-2.40%17.41%
ISWD.L
iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
19.77%20.00%6.05%23.43%-11.47%22.58%8.33%22.72%-9.25%19.62%

Correlation

The correlation between MVOL.L and ISWD.L is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2012

0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between MVOL.L and ISWD.L has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

MVOL.L vs. ISWD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MVOL.L
ISWD.L

Technology

20.1%
42.8%

Financial Services

14.0%
0.0%

Healthcare

13.8%
10.4%

Communication Services

12.1%
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

10.9%
3.7%

Industrials

9.2%
12.9%

Utilities

8.0%
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

5.6%
6.9%

Energy

4.5%
11.6%

Basic Materials

1.1%
9.6%

Real Estate

0.7%
0.2%

Technology

MVOL.L
20.1%
ISWD.L
42.8%

Financial Services

MVOL.L
14.0%
ISWD.L
0.0%

Healthcare

MVOL.L
13.8%
ISWD.L
10.4%

Communication Services

MVOL.L
12.1%
ISWD.L
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

MVOL.L
10.9%
ISWD.L
3.7%

Industrials

MVOL.L
9.2%
ISWD.L
12.9%

Utilities

MVOL.L
8.0%
ISWD.L
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

MVOL.L
5.6%
ISWD.L
6.9%

Energy

MVOL.L
4.5%
ISWD.L
11.6%

Basic Materials

MVOL.L
1.1%
ISWD.L
9.6%

Real Estate

MVOL.L
0.7%
ISWD.L
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MVOL.L vs. ISWD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVOL.L
MVOL.L Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
MVOL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVOL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVOL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
MVOL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVOL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

ISWD.L
ISWD.L Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
ISWD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISWD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISWD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
ISWD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISWD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVOL.L vs. ISWD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS (MVOL.L) and iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ISWD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MVOL.LISWD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.51

-0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.25

5.09

-4.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.61

18.41

-17.81

MVOL.L vs. ISWD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVOL.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.19, which is lower than the ISWD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVOL.L and ISWD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MVOL.LISWD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

2.93

-2.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.81

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.75

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.51

+0.22

Drawdowns

MVOL.L vs. ISWD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVOL.L drawdown since its inception was -28.82%, smaller than the maximum ISWD.L drawdown of -48.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVOL.L and ISWD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MVOL.LISWD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.82%

-48.12%

+19.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.78%

-7.30%

+1.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.14%

-18.46%

+10.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.52%

-22.70%

+4.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.82%

-33.38%

+4.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.86%

-0.20%

-3.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.34%

-4.70%

+1.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.36%

2.02%

+0.34%

Volatility

MVOL.L vs. ISWD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS (MVOL.L) is 2.01%, while iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ISWD.L) has a volatility of 4.07%. This indicates that MVOL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISWD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MVOL.LISWD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.01%

4.07%

-2.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.58%

9.72%

-4.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.74%

12.65%

-4.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.64%

15.46%

-4.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.65%

15.67%

-4.02%

MVOL.L vs. ISWD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVOL.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ISWD.L's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

MVOL.L vs. ISWD.L - Dividend Comparison

MVOL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ISWD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISWD.L
iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.27%1.50%1.74%1.99%2.43%1.98%1.88%2.37%2.39%2.09%2.09%2.62%
MVOL.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MVOL.L and ISWD.L have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MVOL.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MVOL.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ISWD.L.

MVOL.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while ISWD.L tracks MSCI World Islamic Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for MVOL.L and 0.60% for ISWD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MVOL.L and ISWD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer