MVLL vs. PTIR
MVLL (GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF) and PTIR (GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from GraniteShares - MVLL tracks the Marvell Technology Inc. (MRVL) while PTIR tracks the Palantir Technologies Inc. (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, MVLL returned 195.07% vs -56.45% for PTIR. Their 0.28 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MVLL charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for PTIR.
Performance
MVLL vs. PTIR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MVLL achieves a 183.32% return, which is significantly higher than PTIR's -62.18% return.
MVLL
- 1D
- 4.74%
- 1M
- -46.40%
- 6M
- 236.40%
- YTD
- 183.32%
- 1Y
- 195.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 97.66%
PTIR
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- -11.63%
- 6M
- -43.20%
- YTD
- -62.18%
- 1Y
- -56.45%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 164.95%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $64.72M | $85.12M | $269.82M | |
| $34.43M | $50.90M | $65.92M |
MVLL vs. PTIR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MVLL GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF | 183.32% | -8.44% |
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF | -62.18% | 231.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between MVLL and PTIR is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2025 | 0.28 |
MVLL vs. PTIR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MVLL
PTIR
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
MVLL
PTIR
Basic Materials
MVLL
-
PTIR
-
Communication Services
MVLL
-
PTIR
-
Consumer Cyclical
MVLL
-
PTIR
-
Consumer Defensive
MVLL
-
PTIR
-
Energy
MVLL
-
PTIR
-
Financial Services
MVLL
-
PTIR
-
Healthcare
MVLL
-
PTIR
-
Industrials
MVLL
-
PTIR
-
Real Estate
MVLL
-
PTIR
-
Utilities
MVLL
-
PTIR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MVLL vs. PTIR — Risk / Return Rank
MVLL
PTIR
MVLL vs. PTIR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL) and GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MVLL | PTIR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 0.95 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.94 | -0.74 | +2.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.10 | -1.21 | +6.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MVLL vs. PTIR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MVLL drawdown since its inception was -78.87%, roughly equal to the maximum PTIR drawdown of -79.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVLL and PTIR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MVLL | PTIR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.87% | -79.40% | +0.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -78.87% | -79.40% | +0.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -72.55% | -73.93% | +1.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.03% | -31.05% | +6.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.22% | 48.56% | -18.34% |
Volatility
MVLL vs. PTIR - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL) has a higher volatility of 55.64% compared to GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) at 27.36%. This indicates that MVLL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PTIR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MVLL | PTIR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 55.64% | 27.36% | +28.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 129.12% | 81.50% | +47.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 155.64% | 104.45% | +51.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 151.11% | 127.66% | +23.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 151.11% | 127.66% | +23.45% |
MVLL vs. PTIR - Expense Ratio Comparison
MVLL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than PTIR's 1.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
MVLL vs. PTIR - Dividend Comparison
MVLL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PTIR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.36%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MVLL GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF | 15.36% | 5.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MVLL and PTIR have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MVLL has higher volatility (55.64%) compared to PTIR (27.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MVLL dropped -78.87% vs PTIR's -79.40%.
On 1-year performance, MVLL leads with 195.07% vs -56.45% for PTIR. On fees, PTIR is cheaper at 1.04% per year. On volatility, PTIR has been the lower-risk option at 27.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MVLL has performed better with a 195.07% return vs -56.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PTIR is cheaper with a 1.04% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MVLL.
PTIR has the higher dividend yield at 15.36%, compared with 0.00% for MVLL.
MVLL tracks Marvell Technology Inc. (MRVL), while PTIR tracks Palantir Technologies Inc. (200%). Their fees differ too: 1.50% for MVLL and 1.04% for PTIR.
MVLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.98 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MVLL and PTIR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer