MVIAX vs. VALAX
MVIAX (Praxis Value Index Fund) and VALAX (Al Frank Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, MVIAX returned 12.38%/yr vs 15.04%/yr for VALAX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MVIAX charges 0.78%/yr vs 1.24%/yr for VALAX.
Performance
MVIAX vs. VALAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MVIAX achieves a 14.12% return, which is significantly lower than VALAX's 25.18% return. Over the past 10 years, MVIAX has underperformed VALAX with an annualized return of 12.38%, while VALAX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.04% annualized return.
MVIAX
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 2.94%
- YTD
- 14.12%
- 6M
- 13.53%
- 1Y
- 25.84%
- 3Y*
- 15.54%
- 5Y*
- 11.68%
- 10Y*
- 12.38%
VALAX
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- 4.45%
- YTD
- 25.18%
- 6M
- 23.99%
- 1Y
- 50.76%
- 3Y*
- 25.05%
- 5Y*
- 12.78%
- 10Y*
- 15.04%
MVIAX vs. VALAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MVIAX Praxis Value Index Fund | 14.12% | 12.97% | 10.24% | 20.04% | -7.89% | 24.54% | 3.56% | 34.46% | -8.53% | 16.32% |
VALAX Al Frank Fund | 25.18% | 23.57% | 13.35% | 14.05% | -13.50% | 24.97% | 10.22% | 33.98% | -7.87% | 18.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between MVIAX and VALAX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2006 | 0.93 |
The correlation between MVIAX and VALAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MVIAX vs. VALAX — Risk / Return Rank
MVIAX
VALAX
MVIAX vs. VALAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Praxis Value Index Fund (MVIAX) and Al Frank Fund (VALAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MVIAX | VALAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.64 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.16 | 6.08 | -1.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.83 | 23.87 | -8.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MVIAX vs. VALAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MVIAX drawdown since its inception was -65.34%, which is greater than VALAX's maximum drawdown of -61.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVIAX and VALAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MVIAX | VALAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.34% | -61.26% | -4.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.29% | -8.56% | +2.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.25% | -25.81% | +10.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.89% | -25.81% | +6.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.03% | -38.22% | +2.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | 0.00% | -0.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.08% | -10.72% | -1.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.65% | 2.18% | -0.53% |
Volatility
MVIAX vs. VALAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Praxis Value Index Fund (MVIAX) is 3.25%, while Al Frank Fund (VALAX) has a volatility of 5.42%. This indicates that MVIAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VALAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MVIAX | VALAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.25% | 5.42% | -2.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.73% | 11.48% | -3.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.24% | 14.37% | -4.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.25% | 17.86% | -3.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.82% | 19.39% | -2.57% |
MVIAX vs. VALAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MVIAX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than VALAX's 1.24% expense ratio.
Dividends
MVIAX vs. VALAX - Dividend Comparison
MVIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than VALAX's 6.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MVIAX Praxis Value Index Fund | 0.93% | 1.06% | 9.59% | 4.63% | 5.11% | 3.63% | 8.55% | 4.84% | 7.28% | 6.40% | 2.63% | 5.10% |
VALAX Al Frank Fund | 6.91% | 8.65% | 10.32% | 5.95% | 8.62% | 6.83% | 7.17% | 13.51% | 10.73% | 10.66% | 5.32% | 9.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MVIAX and VALAX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VALAX has higher volatility (5.42%) compared to MVIAX (3.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MVIAX dropped -65.34% vs VALAX's -61.26%.
VALAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.63 vs 2.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MVIAX and VALAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer