MVEA.L vs. XMVU.L
MVEA.L (iShares Edge MSCI USA Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF) and XMVU.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, from iShares and Xtrackers respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MVEA.L returned 7.01%/yr vs 8.39%/yr for XMVU.L. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.
Performance
MVEA.L vs. XMVU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
MVEA.L is traded in GBP, while XMVU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XMVU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MVEA.L achieves a 1.73% return, which is significantly lower than XMVU.L's 2.55% return.
MVEA.L
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 3.29%
- YTD
- 1.73%
- 6M
- 1.21%
- 1Y
- 4.08%
- 3Y*
- 6.81%
- 5Y*
- 7.01%
- 10Y*
- —
XMVU.L
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 3.21%
- YTD
- 2.55%
- 6M
- 2.11%
- 1Y
- 5.35%
- 3Y*
- 8.76%
- 5Y*
- 8.39%
- 10Y*
- —
MVEA.L vs. XMVU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MVEA.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF | 1.73% | -2.72% | 14.94% | 6.35% | -1.55% | 26.04% | 0.75% |
XMVU.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D | 2.52% | 0.25% | 17.70% | 4.30% | 1.22% | 22.78% | -0.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between MVEA.L and XMVU.L is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2020 | 0.89 |
The correlation between MVEA.L and XMVU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
MVEA.L vs. XMVU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MVEA.L
XMVU.L
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
MVEA.L
XMVU.L
Healthcare
MVEA.L
XMVU.L
Financial Services
MVEA.L
XMVU.L
Consumer Defensive
MVEA.L
XMVU.L
Consumer Cyclical
MVEA.L
XMVU.L
Communication Services
MVEA.L
XMVU.L
Industrials
MVEA.L
XMVU.L
Utilities
MVEA.L
XMVU.L
Energy
MVEA.L
XMVU.L
Basic Materials
MVEA.L
XMVU.L
Real Estate
MVEA.L
XMVU.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MVEA.L vs. XMVU.L — Risk / Return Rank
MVEA.L
XMVU.L
MVEA.L vs. XMVU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (MVEA.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D (XMVU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MVEA.L | XMVU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.10 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.66 | 1.05 | -0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.64 | 2.53 | -0.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MVEA.L | XMVU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 | 0.56 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.69 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.65 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
MVEA.L vs. XMVU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MVEA.L drawdown since its inception was -14.36%, smaller than the maximum XMVU.L drawdown of -24.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVEA.L and XMVU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MVEA.L | XMVU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.36% | -24.94% | +10.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.43% | -5.07% | -0.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.36% | -11.48% | -2.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.36% | -11.48% | -2.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.95% | -2.86% | -4.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.43% | -4.01% | -0.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.19% | 2.11% | +0.08% |
Volatility
MVEA.L vs. XMVU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI USA Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (MVEA.L) is 2.87%, while Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D (XMVU.L) has a volatility of 3.31%. This indicates that MVEA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMVU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MVEA.L | XMVU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.87% | 3.31% | -0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.11% | 7.14% | -1.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.60% | 9.47% | -0.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.61% | 12.13% | -0.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.94% | 13.83% | -1.89% |
MVEA.L vs. XMVU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MVEA.L and XMVU.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MVEA.L vs. XMVU.L - Dividend Comparison
MVEA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XMVU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MVEA.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMVU.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D | 1.18% | 1.24% | 1.31% | 1.33% | 1.82% | 1.27% | 1.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MVEA.L and XMVU.L have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MVEA.L and XMVU.L have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.
Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers.
Find the right allocation for MVEA.L and XMVU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer