PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MVEA.L vs. XMVU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MVEA.L vs. XMVU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI USA Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (MVEA.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D (XMVU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MVEA.L is traded in GBP, while XMVU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XMVU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVEA.L achieves a 1.73% return, which is significantly lower than XMVU.L's 2.55% return.


MVEA.L

1D
0.03%
1M
3.29%
YTD
1.73%
6M
1.21%
1Y
4.08%
3Y*
6.81%
5Y*
7.01%
10Y*

XMVU.L

1D
-0.11%
1M
3.21%
YTD
2.55%
6M
2.11%
1Y
5.35%
3Y*
8.76%
5Y*
8.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MVEA.L vs. XMVU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MVEA.L
iShares Edge MSCI USA Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF
1.73%-2.72%14.94%6.35%-1.55%26.04%0.75%
XMVU.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D
2.52%0.25%17.70%4.30%1.22%22.78%-0.44%

Correlation

The correlation between MVEA.L and XMVU.L is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2020

0.89

The correlation between MVEA.L and XMVU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

MVEA.L vs. XMVU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MVEA.L
XMVU.L

Technology

30.2%
29.6%

Healthcare

15.0%
12.7%

Financial Services

12.7%
13.7%

Consumer Defensive

9.3%
10.0%

Consumer Cyclical

6.6%
6.4%

Communication Services

6.2%
6.0%

Industrials

5.7%
6.2%

Utilities

4.7%
7.6%

Energy

3.4%
3.5%

Basic Materials

3.2%
2.2%

Real Estate

3.1%
2.2%

Technology

MVEA.L
30.2%
XMVU.L
29.6%

Healthcare

MVEA.L
15.0%
XMVU.L
12.7%

Financial Services

MVEA.L
12.7%
XMVU.L
13.7%

Consumer Defensive

MVEA.L
9.3%
XMVU.L
10.0%

Consumer Cyclical

MVEA.L
6.6%
XMVU.L
6.4%

Communication Services

MVEA.L
6.2%
XMVU.L
6.0%

Industrials

MVEA.L
5.7%
XMVU.L
6.2%

Utilities

MVEA.L
4.7%
XMVU.L
7.6%

Energy

MVEA.L
3.4%
XMVU.L
3.5%

Basic Materials

MVEA.L
3.2%
XMVU.L
2.2%

Real Estate

MVEA.L
3.1%
XMVU.L
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MVEA.L vs. XMVU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVEA.L
MVEA.L Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
MVEA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVEA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVEA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
MVEA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVEA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

XMVU.L
XMVU.L Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
XMVU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMVU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMVU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
XMVU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMVU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVEA.L vs. XMVU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (MVEA.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D (XMVU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MVEA.LXMVU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.10

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.66

1.05

-0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.64

2.53

-0.89

MVEA.L vs. XMVU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVEA.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is comparable to the XMVU.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVEA.L and XMVU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MVEA.LXMVU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

0.56

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.69

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.65

-0.03

Drawdowns

MVEA.L vs. XMVU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVEA.L drawdown since its inception was -14.36%, smaller than the maximum XMVU.L drawdown of -24.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVEA.L and XMVU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MVEA.LXMVU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.36%

-24.94%

+10.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.43%

-5.07%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.36%

-11.48%

-2.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.36%

-11.48%

-2.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.95%

-2.86%

-4.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.43%

-4.01%

-0.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

2.11%

+0.08%

Volatility

MVEA.L vs. XMVU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI USA Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (MVEA.L) is 2.87%, while Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D (XMVU.L) has a volatility of 3.31%. This indicates that MVEA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMVU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MVEA.LXMVU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

3.31%

-0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.11%

7.14%

-1.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.60%

9.47%

-0.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.61%

12.13%

-0.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.94%

13.83%

-1.89%

MVEA.L vs. XMVU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MVEA.L and XMVU.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MVEA.L vs. XMVU.L - Dividend Comparison

MVEA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XMVU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
MVEA.L
iShares Edge MSCI USA Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XMVU.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D
1.18%1.24%1.31%1.33%1.82%1.27%1.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


MVEA.L and XMVU.L have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MVEA.L and XMVU.L have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MVEA.L and XMVU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer