MVC.MC vs. LI.PA
MVC.MC (Metrovacesa S.A.) and LI.PA (Klepierre SA) are both stocks. MVC.MC operates in Residential Construction (Consumer Cyclical), while LI.PA operates in REIT - Retail (Real Estate). Over the past 5 years, MVC.MC returned 22.27%/yr vs 14.71%/yr for LI.PA. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MVC.MC vs. LI.PA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MVC.MC achieves a 19.78% return, which is significantly higher than LI.PA's 5.17% return.
MVC.MC
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- -5.63%
- YTD
- 19.78%
- 6M
- 9.49%
- 1Y
- 16.11%
- 3Y*
- 27.45%
- 5Y*
- 22.27%
- 10Y*
- —
LI.PA
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- YTD
- 5.17%
- 6M
- 6.24%
- 1Y
- 7.76%
- 3Y*
- 22.70%
- 5Y*
- 14.71%
- 10Y*
- 4.04%
MVC.MC vs. LI.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MVC.MC Metrovacesa S.A. | 19.78% | 23.28% | 16.98% | 37.67% | 13.05% | 30.93% | -30.97% | -18.60% | -30.69% |
LI.PA Klepierre SA | 5.17% | 28.66% | 17.45% | 24.13% | 11.69% | 18.41% | -42.43% | 34.58% | -14.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between MVC.MC and LI.PA is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2018 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MVC.MC vs. LI.PA — Risk / Return Rank
MVC.MC
LI.PA
MVC.MC vs. LI.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Metrovacesa S.A. (MVC.MC) and Klepierre SA (LI.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MVC.MC | LI.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.10 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.84 | 0.69 | +0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.99 | 1.49 | +0.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MVC.MC | LI.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 | 0.48 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 | 0.56 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | 0.36 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
MVC.MC vs. LI.PA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MVC.MC drawdown since its inception was -69.80%, smaller than the maximum LI.PA drawdown of -79.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVC.MC and LI.PA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MVC.MC | LI.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.80% | -79.99% | +10.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.87% | -11.08% | -7.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.87% | -13.27% | -5.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.94% | -28.90% | +8.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -70.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.39% | -2.38% | -13.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.42% | -18.41% | -15.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.05% | 5.16% | +2.89% |
Volatility
MVC.MC vs. LI.PA - Volatility Comparison
Metrovacesa S.A. (MVC.MC) has a higher volatility of 4.36% compared to Klepierre SA (LI.PA) at 3.95%. This indicates that MVC.MC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LI.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MVC.MC | LI.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.36% | 3.95% | +0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.58% | 12.94% | +10.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.74% | 16.11% | +12.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.83% | 26.03% | -0.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.25% | 35.72% | -6.47% |
Dividends
MVC.MC vs. LI.PA - Dividend Comparison
MVC.MC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.54%, more than LI.PA's 5.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LI.PA Klepierre SA | 5.43% | 5.48% | 3.60% | 6.93% | 7.90% | 4.80% | 7.35% | 6.20% | 7.27% | 4.96% | 4.55% | 3.90% |
MVC.MC Metrovacesa S.A. | 19.54% | 16.88% | 7.86% | 8.17% | 25.90% | 11.17% | 0.00% | 3.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
MVC.MC vs. LI.PA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Metrovacesa S.A. and Klepierre SA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
MVC.MC and LI.PA have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for MVC.MC and LI.PA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer