MUU vs. TECL
MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) and TECL (Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion. MUU is actively managed, while TECL is passively managed. Over the past year, MUU returned 6522.95% vs 267.85% for TECL. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MUU charges 1.06%/yr vs 0.91%/yr for TECL.
Performance
MUU vs. TECL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MUU achieves a 961.23% return, which is significantly higher than TECL's 125.87% return.
MUU
- 1D
- 3.08%
- 1M
- 218.90%
- YTD
- 961.23%
- 6M
- 1,422.01%
- 1Y
- 6,522.95%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TECL
- 1D
- -2.99%
- 1M
- 73.10%
- YTD
- 125.87%
- 6M
- 118.69%
- 1Y
- 267.85%
- 3Y*
- 80.64%
- 5Y*
- 43.44%
- 10Y*
- 54.49%
MUU vs. TECL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 961.23% | 599.03% | -43.09% |
TECL Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares | 125.87% | 38.60% | -1.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between MUU and TECL is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2024 | 0.66 |
The correlation between MUU and TECL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MUU vs. TECL — Risk / Return Rank
MUU
TECL
MUU vs. TECL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) and Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MUU | TECL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +46.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.91 | 1.48 | +0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 125.85 | 5.79 | +120.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 426.84 | 16.63 | +410.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MUU | TECL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.40 | 4.35 | +46.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 6.68 | 0.76 | +5.92 |
Drawdowns
MUU vs. TECL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MUU drawdown since its inception was -75.07%, roughly equal to the maximum TECL drawdown of -77.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUU and TECL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MUU | TECL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.07% | -77.96% | +2.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.72% | -46.58% | -6.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -66.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -77.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -77.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.99% | +2.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.44% | -18.38% | -5.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.51% | 16.19% | -0.68% |
Volatility
MUU vs. TECL - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) has a higher volatility of 54.78% compared to Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL) at 20.70%. This indicates that MUU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TECL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MUU | TECL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 54.78% | 20.70% | +34.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 105.07% | 49.83% | +55.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 131.77% | 62.17% | +69.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 133.67% | 74.09% | +59.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 133.67% | 72.35% | +61.32% |
MUU vs. TECL - Expense Ratio Comparison
MUU has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than TECL's 0.91% expense ratio.
Dividends
MUU vs. TECL - Dividend Comparison
MUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than TECL's 3.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 0.46% | 4.27% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TECL Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares | 3.15% | 7.19% | 0.29% | 0.28% | 0.22% | 0.32% | 0.52% | 0.25% | 0.47% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MUU and TECL have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MUU has higher volatility (54.78%) compared to TECL (20.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUU dropped -75.07% vs TECL's -77.96%.
On 1-year performance, MUU leads with 6522.95% vs 267.85% for TECL. On fees, TECL is cheaper at 0.91% per year. On volatility, TECL has been the lower-risk option at 20.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MUU has performed better with a 6522.95% return vs 267.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TECL is cheaper with a 0.91% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for MUU.
TECL has the higher dividend yield at 3.15%, compared with 0.46% for MUU.
Their fees differ too: 1.06% for MUU and 0.91% for TECL.
MUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (50.40 vs 4.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MUU and TECL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer