MUU vs. SPXS
MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) and SPXS (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - MUU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily), while SPXS is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.70, they often move in opposite directions. MUU charges 1.01%/yr vs 1.08%/yr for SPXS.
Performance
MUU vs. SPXS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MUU
- 1D
- -26.28%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPXS
- 1D
- 3.42%
- 1M
- 3.11%
- YTD
- -20.76%
- 6M
- -18.37%
- 1Y
- -44.21%
- 3Y*
- -40.67%
- 5Y*
- -33.53%
- 10Y*
- -42.08%
MUU vs. SPXS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | -12.11% |
SPXS Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares | 7.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between MUU and SPXS is -0.70, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2026 | -0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MUU vs. SPXS — Risk / Return Rank
MUU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPXS
MUU vs. SPXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares (SPXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MUU | SPXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.79 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.94 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.63 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MUU vs. SPXS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MUU drawdown since its inception was -26.28%, smaller than the maximum SPXS drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUU and SPXS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MUU | SPXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.28% | -100.00% | +73.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -46.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -84.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -90.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.28% | -100.00% | +73.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.19% | -96.29% | +86.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 29.25% | — |
Volatility
MUU vs. SPXS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MUU | SPXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.08% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 29.38% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 295.32% | 37.37% | +257.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 295.32% | 50.68% | +244.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 295.32% | 53.59% | +241.73% |
MUU vs. SPXS - Expense Ratio Comparison
MUU has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than SPXS's 1.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
MUU vs. SPXS - Dividend Comparison
MUU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPXS Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares | 4.62% | 4.93% | 6.18% | 5.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.51% | 1.74% | 0.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MUU and SPXS have a correlation of -0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MUU is cheaper at 1.01% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MUU is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for SPXS.
SPXS has the higher dividend yield at 4.62%, compared with 0.00% for MUU.
MUU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SPXS is Inverse Equities. MUU tracks Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily), while SPXS tracks S&P 500 Index (-300%). Their fees differ too: 1.01% for MUU and 1.08% for SPXS.
Find the right allocation for MUU and SPXS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer