MUU vs. QQQE
MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) and QQQE (Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - MUU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily), while QQQE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. MUU charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for QQQE.
Performance
MUU vs. QQQE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MUU
- 1D
- -26.28%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQE
- 1D
- -2.31%
- 1M
- 1.82%
- YTD
- 16.25%
- 6M
- 14.96%
- 1Y
- 24.99%
- 3Y*
- 17.55%
- 5Y*
- 9.11%
- 10Y*
- 15.77%
MUU vs. QQQE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | -12.11% |
QQQE Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares | -3.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between MUU and QQQE is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2026 | 1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MUU vs. QQQE — Risk / Return Rank
MUU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QQQE
MUU vs. QQQE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) and Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MUU | QQQE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.28 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.67 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.96 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MUU vs. QQQE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MUU drawdown since its inception was -26.28%, smaller than the maximum QQQE drawdown of -32.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUU and QQQE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MUU | QQQE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.28% | -32.14% | +5.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.28% | -3.24% | -23.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.19% | -5.16% | -5.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.80% | — |
Volatility
MUU vs. QQQE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MUU | QQQE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.11% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.74% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 295.32% | 15.68% | +279.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 295.32% | 20.55% | +274.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 295.32% | 20.80% | +274.52% |
MUU vs. QQQE - Expense Ratio Comparison
MUU has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQE's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
MUU vs. QQQE - Dividend Comparison
MUU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQE Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares | 0.53% | 0.52% | 0.86% | 0.79% | 0.98% | 3.83% | 0.54% | 0.74% | 0.80% | 0.65% | 1.17% | 0.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, MUU and QQQE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, QQQE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQQE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for MUU.
QQQE has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.00% for MUU.
MUU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QQQE is Nasdaq-100. MUU tracks Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily), while QQQE tracks NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for MUU and 0.35% for QQQE.
Find the right allocation for MUU and QQQE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer