PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MUU vs. NTSD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MUU vs. NTSD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MUU

1D
3.08%
1M
218.90%
YTD
961.23%
6M
1,422.01%
1Y
6,522.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NTSD

1D
-1.11%
1M
7.13%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUU vs. NTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MUU and NTSD is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2026

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MUU vs. NTSD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUU
MUU Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUU Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
MUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUU Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

NTSD
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUU vs. NTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MUUNTSDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.91

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

125.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

426.84

MUU vs. NTSD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MUUNTSDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

6.68

5.08

+1.60

Drawdowns

MUU vs. NTSD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUU drawdown since its inception was -75.07%, which is greater than NTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUU and NTSD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MUUNTSDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.07%

-5.20%

-69.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.11%

+1.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.44%

-0.84%

-22.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.51%

Volatility

MUU vs. NTSD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MUUNTSDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

54.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

105.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

131.77%

24.28%

+107.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

133.67%

24.28%

+109.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

133.67%

24.28%

+109.39%

MUU vs. NTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUU has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSD's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

MUU vs. NTSD - Dividend Comparison

MUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, while NTSD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


MUU and NTSD have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for MUU.

MUU has the higher dividend yield at 0.46%, compared with 0.00% for NTSD.

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for MUU and 0.35% for NTSD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MUU and NTSD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer