MUU vs. NTSD
MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) and NTSD (WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund) are both Leveraged Equities funds. MUU is passively managed, while NTSD is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MUU charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NTSD.
Performance
MUU vs. NTSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MUU
- 1D
- -26.28%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NTSD
- 1D
- -2.11%
- 1M
- -0.58%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MUU vs. NTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | -12.11% |
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund | -2.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between MUU and NTSD is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2026 | 0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MUU vs. NTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MUU vs. NTSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MUU drawdown since its inception was -26.28%, which is greater than NTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUU and NTSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MUU | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.28% | -5.58% | -20.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.28% | -2.97% | -23.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.19% | -1.09% | -9.10% |
Volatility
MUU vs. NTSD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MUU | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 295.32% | 25.11% | +270.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 295.32% | 25.11% | +270.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 295.32% | 25.11% | +270.21% |
MUU vs. NTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
MUU has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSD's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
MUU vs. NTSD - Dividend Comparison
Neither MUU nor NTSD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, MUU and NTSD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for MUU.
MUU and NTSD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for MUU and 0.35% for NTSD.
Find the right allocation for MUU and NTSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer