MUU vs. DUOG
MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) and DUOG (Leverage Shares 2X Long DUOL Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. MUU is passively managed, while DUOG is actively managed. Their -0.16 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. MUU charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for DUOG.
Performance
MUU vs. DUOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MUU achieves a 451.56% return, which is significantly higher than DUOG's -55.92% return.
MUU
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -27.29%
- 6M
- 233.36%
- YTD
- 451.56%
- 1Y
- 3,034.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 458.18%
DUOG
- 1D
- -2.61%
- 1M
- 5.22%
- 6M
- 5.42%
- YTD
- -55.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $402.79K | $350.33K | $687.09K | |
| $1.51B | $1.48B | $2.30B |
MUU vs. DUOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 451.56% | 13.83% |
DUOG Leverage Shares 2X Long DUOL Daily ETF | -55.92% | -25.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between MUU and DUOG is -0.16, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | -0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MUU vs. DUOG — Risk / Return Rank
MUU
DUOG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MUU vs. DUOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long DUOL Daily ETF (DUOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MUU | DUOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 45.22 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 143.78 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MUU vs. DUOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MUU drawdown since its inception was -75.07%, smaller than the maximum DUOG drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUU and DUOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MUU | DUOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.07% | -83.13% | +8.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -68.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.06% | -66.98% | +11.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.55% | -65.01% | +40.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.37% | — | — |
Volatility
MUU vs. DUOG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MUU | DUOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 62.67% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 133.72% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 161.71% | 116.50% | +45.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 146.59% | 116.50% | +30.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 146.59% | 116.50% | +30.09% |
MUU vs. DUOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
MUU has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than DUOG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
MUU vs. DUOG - Dividend Comparison
MUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, while DUOG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
DUOG Leverage Shares 2X Long DUOL Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 1.23% | 4.27% | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MUU and DUOG have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DUOG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DUOG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for MUU.
MUU has the higher dividend yield at 1.23%, compared with 0.00% for DUOG.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for MUU and 0.75% for DUOG.
Find the right allocation for MUU and DUOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer