MUU vs. CRMU
MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) and CRMU (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds - MUU tracks the Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily) while CRMU tracks the Critical Metals Corp. (CRML). Both are passively managed. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MUU charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CRMU.
Performance
MUU vs. CRMU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MUU
- 1D
- -26.28%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRMU
- 1D
- -13.83%
- 1M
- -28.54%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MUU vs. CRMU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | -12.11% |
CRMU Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF | -15.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between MUU and CRMU is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2026 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MUU vs. CRMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF (CRMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MUU vs. CRMU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MUU drawdown since its inception was -26.28%, smaller than the maximum CRMU drawdown of -73.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUU and CRMU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MUU | CRMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.28% | -73.81% | +47.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.28% | -64.46% | +38.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.19% | -46.63% | +36.44% |
Volatility
MUU vs. CRMU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MUU | CRMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 295.32% | 246.03% | +49.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 295.32% | 246.03% | +49.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 295.32% | 246.03% | +49.29% |
MUU vs. CRMU - Expense Ratio Comparison
MUU has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than CRMU's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
MUU vs. CRMU - Dividend Comparison
Neither MUU nor CRMU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MUU and CRMU have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRMU is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRMU is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for MUU.
MUU and CRMU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
MUU tracks Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily), while CRMU tracks Critical Metals Corp. (CRML). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for MUU and 0.75% for CRMU.
Find the right allocation for MUU and CRMU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer