PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MUSI vs. FDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MUSI vs. FDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Multisector Income ETF (MUSI) and American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MUSI vs. FDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MUSI
American Century Multisector Income ETF
-0.07%8.32%5.14%7.51%-10.33%0.58%
FDG
American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF
-10.09%22.13%45.89%37.22%-35.74%-0.48%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUSI achieves a -0.07% return, which is significantly higher than FDG's -10.09% return.


MUSI

1D
0.60%
1M
-1.80%
YTD
-0.07%
6M
1.26%
1Y
5.87%
3Y*
5.93%
5Y*
10Y*

FDG

1D
4.35%
1M
-4.42%
YTD
-10.09%
6M
-5.30%
1Y
25.52%
3Y*
24.88%
5Y*
8.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MUSI vs. FDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUSI has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than FDG's 0.45% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MUSI vs. FDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUSI
MUSI Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
MUSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUSI Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
MUSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUSI Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

FDG
FDG Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDG Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDG Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUSI vs. FDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Multisector Income ETF (MUSI) and American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MUSIFDGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.35

1.08

+0.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.77

1.67

+0.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.23

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.98

1.58

+0.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.07

5.57

+2.50

MUSI vs. FDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUSI Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the FDG Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUSI and FDG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MUSIFDGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35

1.08

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.80

-0.37

Correlation

The correlation between MUSI and FDG is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

MUSI vs. FDG - Dividend Comparison

MUSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.74%, while FDG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023202220212020
MUSI
American Century Multisector Income ETF
5.74%5.74%6.00%5.20%4.02%1.62%0.00%
FDG
American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Drawdowns

MUSI vs. FDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUSI drawdown since its inception was -13.91%, smaller than the maximum FDG drawdown of -43.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUSI and FDG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MUSIFDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.91%

-43.69%

+29.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.99%

-15.71%

+12.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.80%

-12.04%

+10.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.33%

-13.75%

+9.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.74%

4.45%

-3.71%

Volatility

MUSI vs. FDG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Century Multisector Income ETF (MUSI) is 1.70%, while American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG) has a volatility of 7.98%. This indicates that MUSI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MUSIFDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.70%

7.98%

-6.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.27%

14.04%

-11.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.35%

23.85%

-19.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.88%

24.68%

-19.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.88%

25.05%

-20.17%