PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDG vs. BRK-B
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDG vs. BRK-B - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDG achieves a 7.52% return, which is significantly higher than BRK-B's -5.43% return.


FDG

1D
-2.00%
1M
3.68%
YTD
7.52%
6M
9.17%
1Y
31.12%
3Y*
29.27%
5Y*
12.61%
10Y*

BRK-B

1D
0.82%
1M
1.46%
YTD
-5.43%
6M
-5.61%
1Y
-4.51%
3Y*
13.00%
5Y*
10.20%
10Y*
12.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDG vs. BRK-B - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FDG
American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF
7.52%22.13%45.89%37.22%-35.74%8.52%93.61%
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
-5.43%10.89%27.09%15.46%3.31%28.95%29.01%

Correlation

The correlation between FDG and BRK-B is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2020

0.30

The correlation between FDG and BRK-B shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.32 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDG vs. BRK-B — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDG
FDG Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
FDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDG Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
FDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDG Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

BRK-B
BRK-B Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
BRK-B Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRK-B Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRK-B Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
BRK-B Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRK-B Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDG vs. BRK-B - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDGBRK-BDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.76

-0.32

+2.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.37

-0.34

+2.71

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

0.96

+0.34

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

-0.48

+2.47

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.02

-1.02

+8.04

FDG vs. BRK-B - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDG Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is higher than the BRK-B Sharpe Ratio of -0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDG and BRK-B, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDGBRK-BDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.76

-0.32

+2.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.60

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

0.48

+0.44

Drawdowns

FDG vs. BRK-B - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDG drawdown since its inception was -43.69%, smaller than the maximum BRK-B drawdown of -53.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDG and BRK-B.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDGBRK-BDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.69%

-53.86%

+10.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.71%

-9.42%

-6.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.14%

-14.95%

-11.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.69%

-26.58%

-17.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.13%

-11.94%

+8.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.43%

-11.07%

-2.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.45%

4.57%

-0.12%

Volatility

FDG vs. BRK-B - Volatility Comparison

American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG) has a higher volatility of 5.18% compared to Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) at 3.75%. This indicates that FDG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRK-B based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDGBRK-BDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.18%

3.75%

+1.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.03%

10.68%

+3.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.77%

14.33%

+3.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.67%

17.11%

+7.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.90%

19.43%

+5.47%

Dividends

FDG vs. BRK-B - Dividend Comparison

Neither FDG nor BRK-B has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FDG
American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDG and BRK-B have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDG has higher volatility (5.18%) compared to BRK-B (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDG dropped -43.69% vs BRK-B's -53.86%.

FDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDG and BRK-B

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer