PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MUSEX vs. MFEKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MUSEX vs. MFEKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Blended Research Core Equity Fund (MUSEX) and MFS Growth R6 (MFEKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUSEX achieves a 9.45% return, which is significantly higher than MFEKX's 3.75% return. Over the past 10 years, MUSEX has underperformed MFEKX with an annualized return of 14.80%, while MFEKX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.90% annualized return.


MUSEX

1D
-0.42%
1M
0.47%
YTD
9.45%
6M
8.35%
1Y
23.62%
3Y*
21.33%
5Y*
13.89%
10Y*
14.80%

MFEKX

1D
-1.47%
1M
-0.14%
YTD
3.75%
6M
2.67%
1Y
13.43%
3Y*
25.04%
5Y*
12.69%
10Y*
17.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUSEX vs. MFEKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MUSEX
MFS Blended Research Core Equity Fund
9.45%16.10%25.17%28.30%-16.02%29.24%15.47%28.80%-7.82%18.95%
MFEKX
MFS Growth R6
3.75%12.44%49.62%36.27%-31.07%23.71%31.77%37.82%2.40%30.97%

Correlation

The correlation between MUSEX and MFEKX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2011

0.90

The correlation between MUSEX and MFEKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MUSEX vs. MFEKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUSEX
MUSEX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
MUSEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUSEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUSEX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
MUSEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUSEX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

MFEKX
MFEKX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
MFEKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFEKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFEKX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
MFEKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFEKX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUSEX vs. MFEKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Blended Research Core Equity Fund (MUSEX) and MFS Growth R6 (MFEKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MUSEXMFEKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.16

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

0.85

+2.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.54

2.73

+9.81

MUSEX vs. MFEKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUSEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is higher than the MFEKX Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUSEX and MFEKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MUSEX vs. MFEKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUSEX drawdown since its inception was -54.78%, which is greater than MFEKX's maximum drawdown of -36.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUSEX and MFEKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MUSEXMFEKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.78%

-36.06%

-18.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.60%

-17.27%

+8.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.18%

-23.22%

+4.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.87%

-36.06%

+14.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.60%

-36.06%

+1.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.38%

-2.76%

+1.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.58%

-5.63%

-4.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

5.36%

-3.38%

Volatility

MUSEX vs. MFEKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Blended Research Core Equity Fund (MUSEX) is 4.43%, while MFS Growth R6 (MFEKX) has a volatility of 6.54%. This indicates that MUSEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MFEKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MUSEXMFEKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.43%

6.54%

-2.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.00%

13.39%

-3.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.69%

16.83%

-4.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.10%

22.03%

-4.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.36%

21.28%

-2.92%

MUSEX vs. MFEKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUSEX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than MFEKX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

MUSEX vs. MFEKX - Dividend Comparison

MUSEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.54%, less than MFEKX's 14.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MFEKX
MFS Growth R6
14.28%14.82%25.31%4.82%1.04%2.74%3.55%1.57%3.88%2.49%1.70%3.64%
MUSEX
MFS Blended Research Core Equity Fund
6.54%7.15%10.44%3.91%9.26%16.18%7.12%5.19%11.98%2.04%1.20%3.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, MUSEX and MFEKX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MFEKX has higher volatility (6.54%) compared to MUSEX (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUSEX dropped -54.78% vs MFEKX's -36.06%.

MUSEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MUSEX and MFEKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer