PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
MUSC.TO vs. XMH.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

MUSC.TO vs. XMH.TO

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

MUSC.TO (Manulife Multifactor U.S. Small Cap Index ETF Hedged) and XMH.TO (iShares S&P U.S. Mid-Cap Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. MUSC.TO is actively managed, while XMH.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MUSC.TO returned 6.18%/yr vs 7.07%/yr for XMH.TO. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MUSC.TO vs. XMH.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Manulife Multifactor U.S. Small Cap Index ETF Hedged (MUSC.TO) and iShares S&P U.S. Mid-Cap Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XMH.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MUSC.TO having a 13.47% return and XMH.TO slightly higher at 13.72%.

MUSC.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
5.24%
6M
13.47%
YTD
13.47%
1Y
22.18%
3Y*
11.17%
5Y*
6.18%
10Y*
—

XMH.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.76%
6M
8.20%
YTD
13.72%
1Y
19.66%
3Y*
11.75%
5Y*
7.07%
10Y*
9.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUSC.TO vs. XMH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MUSC.TO
Manulife Multifactor U.S. Small Cap Index ETF Hedged		13.47%-3.19%24.99%11.83%-16.41%20.14%12.67%2.78%-4.13%1.38%
XMH.TO
iShares S&P U.S. Mid-Cap Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		13.72%5.45%12.05%15.06%-14.93%21.85%8.32%26.82%-13.77%2.69%

Correlation

The correlation between MUSC.TO and XMH.TO is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 27, 2017

0.17

The correlation between MUSC.TO and XMH.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (3 years) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Manulife Multifactor U.S. Small Cap Index ETF Hedged

iShares S&P U.S. Mid-Cap Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

Often compared with XMH.TO:
XMH.TO vs. VOTXMH.TO vs. XMHQXMH.TO vs. VFV.TOXMH.TO vs. XEF.TOXMH.TO vs. XMD.TOXMH.TO vs. USMVXMH.TO vs. XSU.TO

Return for Risk

MUSC.TO vs. XMH.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
MUSC.TO
MUSC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
MUSC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUSC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUSC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
MUSC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUSC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
XMH.TO
XMH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
XMH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
XMH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUSC.TO vs. XMH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manulife Multifactor U.S. Small Cap Index ETF Hedged (MUSC.TO) and iShares S&P U.S. Mid-Cap Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XMH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

MUSC.TOXMH.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.94
1.25

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
4.49
1.89

+2.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.73

1.23

+1.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.59

2.14

+3.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.06

7.75

+10.30

MUSC.TO vs. XMH.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUSC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the XMH.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUSC.TO and XMH.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MUSC.TO vs. XMH.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUSC.TO drawdown since its inception was -37.77%, smaller than the maximum XMH.TO drawdown of -45.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUSC.TO and XMH.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

MUSC.TOXMH.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.77%

-45.18%

+7.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.00%

-9.24%

+5.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.96%

-24.81%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.96%

-25.86%

+0.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-45.18%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.97%

+1.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.95%

-7.11%

-0.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.23%

2.54%

-1.31%

Volatility

MUSC.TO vs. XMH.TO - Volatility Comparison

Manulife Multifactor U.S. Small Cap Index ETF Hedged (MUSC.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.78% compared to iShares S&P U.S. Mid-Cap Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XMH.TO) at 3.56%. This indicates that MUSC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

MUSC.TOXMH.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.78%

3.56%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.69%

11.81%

-3.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.52%

15.95%

-4.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.28%

19.67%

-1.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.63%

21.26%

+1.37%

Dividends

MUSC.TO vs. XMH.TO - Dividend Comparison

MUSC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than XMH.TO's 0.91% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MUSC.TO
Manulife Multifactor U.S. Small Cap Index ETF Hedged		0.78%0.99%0.93%1.38%2.54%1.16%0.77%1.07%0.98%0.07%0.00%0.00%
XMH.TO
iShares S&P U.S. Mid-Cap Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		0.91%1.10%1.03%1.16%1.30%0.91%1.04%1.34%1.42%0.90%1.55%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

MUSC.TO and XMH.TO have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: Manulife and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MUSC.TO and XMH.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer