PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MURNX vs. LTFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MURNX vs. LTFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mutual of America Investment Corporation - 2050 Retirement Fund (MURNX) and Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund (LTFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MURNX achieves a 9.23% return, which is significantly higher than LTFIX's 8.75% return.


MURNX

1D
-0.60%
1M
2.62%
YTD
9.23%
6M
9.54%
1Y
23.00%
3Y*
16.45%
5Y*
8.26%
10Y*

LTFIX

1D
-0.83%
1M
2.92%
YTD
8.75%
6M
9.13%
1Y
21.71%
3Y*
18.51%
5Y*
9.02%
10Y*
11.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MURNX vs. LTFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MURNX
Mutual of America Investment Corporation - 2050 Retirement Fund
9.23%17.89%14.37%15.78%-16.25%17.85%918.18%
LTFIX
Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund
8.75%17.80%17.28%20.33%-18.84%17.73%15.56%

Correlation

The correlation between MURNX and LTFIX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2020

0.82

The correlation between MURNX and LTFIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MURNX vs. LTFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MURNX
MURNX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
MURNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MURNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
MURNX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
MURNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
MURNX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

LTFIX
LTFIX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
LTFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
LTFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MURNX vs. LTFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mutual of America Investment Corporation - 2050 Retirement Fund (MURNX) and Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund (LTFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MURNXLTFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.34

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

2.52

+0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.46

11.34

+3.13

MURNX vs. LTFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MURNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the LTFIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MURNX and LTFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MURNXLTFIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

1.85

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.59

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.46

-0.29

Drawdowns

MURNX vs. LTFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MURNX drawdown since its inception was -32.96%, smaller than the maximum LTFIX drawdown of -52.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MURNX and LTFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MURNXLTFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.96%

-52.73%

+19.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.50%

-8.71%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.36%

-15.70%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.75%

-26.80%

+3.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.60%

-0.83%

+0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.50%

-7.64%

+2.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

1.93%

-0.21%

Volatility

MURNX vs. LTFIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Mutual of America Investment Corporation - 2050 Retirement Fund (MURNX) is 3.28%, while Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund (LTFIX) has a volatility of 3.46%. This indicates that MURNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LTFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MURNXLTFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.28%

3.46%

-0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.41%

9.48%

-0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.71%

11.87%

-0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.23%

15.46%

+1.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

381.67%

15.84%

+365.83%

MURNX vs. LTFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MURNX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than LTFIX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MURNX vs. LTFIX - Dividend Comparison

MURNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.52%, more than LTFIX's 8.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LTFIX
Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund
8.02%8.73%8.47%4.17%8.60%5.83%3.91%6.03%6.60%3.51%3.99%4.51%
MURNX
Mutual of America Investment Corporation - 2050 Retirement Fund
8.52%9.30%6.49%3.56%11.26%3.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MURNX and LTFIX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LTFIX has higher volatility (3.46%) compared to MURNX (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MURNX dropped -32.96% vs LTFIX's -52.73%.

MURNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MURNX and LTFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer