PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MUNI vs. PMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MUNI vs. PMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active ETF (MUNI) and Putnam Municipal Opportunities Trust (PMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUNI achieves a 1.24% return, which is significantly higher than PMO's -0.58% return. Over the past 10 years, MUNI has underperformed PMO with an annualized return of 2.16%, while PMO has yielded a comparatively higher 2.45% annualized return.


MUNI

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.42%
YTD
1.24%
6M
1.44%
1Y
6.52%
3Y*
3.96%
5Y*
1.27%
10Y*
2.16%

PMO

1D
-0.19%
1M
2.54%
YTD
-0.58%
6M
2.09%
1Y
11.65%
3Y*
6.44%
5Y*
-1.37%
10Y*
2.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUNI vs. PMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MUNI
PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active ETF
1.24%4.72%1.43%6.07%-6.62%0.67%4.83%7.09%0.84%4.86%
PMO
Putnam Municipal Opportunities Trust
-0.58%10.45%3.15%-1.31%-20.32%10.08%9.38%23.13%-4.05%8.89%

Correlation

The correlation between MUNI and PMO is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2009

0.28

The correlation between MUNI and PMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.45 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MUNI vs. PMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUNI
MUNI Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
MUNI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUNI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUNI Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
MUNI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUNI Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

PMO
PMO Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
PMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
PMO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
PMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
PMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUNI vs. PMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active ETF (MUNI) and Putnam Municipal Opportunities Trust (PMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MUNIPMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

1.26

+0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.86

1.63

+1.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.39

5.36

+4.03

MUNI vs. PMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUNI Sharpe Ratio is 2.89, which is higher than the PMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUNI and PMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MUNIPMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.89

1.37

+1.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

-0.09

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.17

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.36

+0.42

Drawdowns

MUNI vs. PMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUNI drawdown since its inception was -11.15%, smaller than the maximum PMO drawdown of -36.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUNI and PMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MUNIPMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.15%

-36.46%

+25.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.29%

-7.19%

+4.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.09%

-16.20%

+12.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.15%

-36.46%

+25.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.15%

-36.46%

+25.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.79%

-13.81%

+13.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.73%

-7.94%

+6.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.70%

2.18%

-1.48%

Volatility

MUNI vs. PMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active ETF (MUNI) is 0.77%, while Putnam Municipal Opportunities Trust (PMO) has a volatility of 2.63%. This indicates that MUNI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MUNIPMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.77%

2.63%

-1.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.60%

6.73%

-5.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27%

8.55%

-6.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.31%

15.02%

-11.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.85%

14.28%

-10.43%

Dividends

MUNI vs. PMO - Dividend Comparison

MUNI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, less than PMO's 4.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MUNI
PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active ETF
3.29%3.26%3.50%3.09%2.13%1.62%1.92%2.44%2.38%2.37%2.37%2.20%
PMO
Putnam Municipal Opportunities Trust
4.52%4.25%4.15%4.64%5.87%4.42%4.65%4.85%5.55%5.26%5.89%5.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


MUNI and PMO have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PMO has higher volatility (2.63%) compared to MUNI (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUNI dropped -11.15% vs PMO's -36.46%.

MUNI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MUNI and PMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer