PFMIX vs. CGMU
PFMIX (PIMCO Municipal Bond Fund) and CGMU (Capital Group Municipal Income ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 3 years, PFMIX returned 5.38%/yr vs 4.67%/yr for CGMU. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PFMIX charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for CGMU.
Performance
PFMIX vs. CGMU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFMIX achieves a 1.76% return, which is significantly higher than CGMU's 1.58% return.
PFMIX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.65%
- YTD
- 1.76%
- 6M
- 2.12%
- 1Y
- 7.41%
- 3Y*
- 5.38%
- 5Y*
- 1.50%
- 10Y*
- 2.92%
CGMU
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 1.58%
- 6M
- 1.97%
- 1Y
- 6.75%
- 3Y*
- 4.67%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PFMIX vs. CGMU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFMIX PIMCO Municipal Bond Fund | 1.76% | 5.70% | 3.60% | 8.04% | 5.19% |
CGMU Capital Group Municipal Income ETF | 1.58% | 5.19% | 2.64% | 6.76% | 4.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFMIX and CGMU is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2022 | 0.68 |
The correlation between PFMIX and CGMU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFMIX vs. CGMU — Risk / Return Rank
PFMIX
CGMU
PFMIX vs. CGMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Municipal Bond Fund (PFMIX) and Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PFMIX | CGMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.69 | 1.64 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.78 | 2.66 | +0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.35 | 8.64 | +0.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFMIX | CGMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.71 | 2.95 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.01 | 1.67 | -0.66 |
Drawdowns
PFMIX vs. CGMU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFMIX drawdown since its inception was -26.51%, which is greater than CGMU's maximum drawdown of -4.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFMIX and CGMU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFMIX | CGMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.51% | -4.11% | -22.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.82% | -2.55% | -0.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.49% | -3.89% | -1.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.49% | -0.71% | +0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.43% | -0.84% | -1.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.83% | 0.78% | +0.05% |
Volatility
PFMIX vs. CGMU - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO Municipal Bond Fund (PFMIX) has a higher volatility of 1.09% compared to Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU) at 0.80%. This indicates that PFMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFMIX | CGMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.09% | 0.80% | +0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.07% | 1.73% | +0.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.90% | 2.30% | +0.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.16% | 3.48% | +0.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.02% | 3.48% | +0.54% |
PFMIX vs. CGMU - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFMIX has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than CGMU's 0.27% expense ratio.
Dividends
PFMIX vs. CGMU - Dividend Comparison
PFMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%, more than CGMU's 3.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGMU Capital Group Municipal Income ETF | 3.33% | 3.32% | 3.21% | 3.08% | 0.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PFMIX PIMCO Municipal Bond Fund | 3.99% | 5.15% | 4.73% | 3.44% | 2.25% | 2.13% | 2.45% | 3.51% | 3.77% | 3.45% | 3.44% | 3.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFMIX and CGMU have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PFMIX has higher volatility (1.09%) compared to CGMU (0.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFMIX dropped -26.51% vs CGMU's -4.11%.
CGMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 2.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PFMIX and CGMU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer